SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 2026

VIBHA KANKANWADI, ABHAY S. WAGHWASE
Prafulla Adhar Shinde – Appellant
Versus
Arvind R. Kale – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
S.P. Shah, Advocate, D.S. Manorkar, Advocate

JUDGMENT/ORDER

VIBHA KANKANWADI, J. - Present petition has been fled under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for taking action against the respondents for contempt of Court in Writ Petition No.10567 of 2018. It is also prayed that the respondents be punished for their willful breach of undertaking and obstruction in the process of administration of justice in the said writ petition.

2. The factual matrix leading to the petition are that the land admeasuring 8200 square meters belonging to the petitioner has been used for construction of National Highway No.6, however, compensation is paid only in respect of acquisition of 1700 square meters land. In other words, the compensation for remaining land admeasuring 6500 square meters is not paid at all and, therefore, the petitioner had fled Writ Petition No.10567 of 2018 seeking compensation. Respondent No.1 has fled afidavit-in-reply in which he had given undertaking that amount of additional compensation would be paid to the petitioner. At the time of afidavit-in-reply, respondent No.1 was the Project Director of PIU, Dhule and the respondent No.2 is the successor of respondent No.1 to the said ofice. The petitioner says th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top