Back
M. S. SONAK, B. P. DESHPANDE
Abhinandan Patel – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case and procedural history. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 20 , 21) |
| 2. arguments by the accused's counsel regarding procedural flaws. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. prosecution responses and arguments. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 19) |
| 4. points arranged for court determination. (Para 18 , 26 , 27 , 31) |
| 5. legal standards for confessions and evidence. (Para 32 , 39 , 40) |
| 6. observe reliability and procedural correctness of witness identifications. (Para 53 , 54 , 56 , 57) |
| 7. crd, sdr analysis and their evidentiary issues. (Para 81 , 82 , 83 , 124 , 125) |
| 8. legal implications of hotel accommodations. (Para 104 , 106 , 107 , 108) |
| 9. final court order and conclusions. (Para 131 , 132) |
JUDGMENT/ORDER
BHARAT P.DESHPANDE, J. - All the above Appeals are taken up for disposal together as the Appellants/Accused persons are challenging the conviction and sentence awarded by the learned Trial Court in Sessions Case No. 42 of 2013.
2. Criminal Appeal No. 689 of 2022 (F) is filed by Abhinandan @ Raj Patel (Accused No. 2), Criminal Appeal No. 702 of 2022 (F) is filed by Anil Bhoe (Accused No. 3), Criminal Appeal No. 1 of 2023 is filed by Aniket Yallurkar (Accused No. 7) and Crimina
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
