DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, SANDEEP V. MARNE
Siddharth Pitabas Nayak – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT/ORDER
SANDEEP V.MARNE, J. - Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of the parties, petition is taken up for final hearing.
2. 'Sealed Cover Procedure' has by now become a familiar term in service jurisprudence. It essentially refers to deferring of action on recommendations of a Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) till the officer concerned is cleared in departmental/judicial proceedings. In the meantime, secrecy is to be maintained in respect of those recommendations by keeping them in a 'sealed envelope'. Only in the event of the officer being exonerated/acquitted in departmental/ criminal proceedings, the sealed envelope is to be opened to find out whether the DPC had recommended his/her promotion. If recommended, he/she earns the promotion which was withheld during pendency of proceedings. This sealed cover procedure emanated out of instructions issued by the Government of India, to which, we have made a reference in our judgment. However, the exact eventualities in which as well as the correct time at which this 'sealed cover procedure' can be adopted has been a subject matter of debate in various decisions of the Apex Court. This is yet another case
Delhi Development Authority vs. H.C. Khurana
Delhi Jal Board vs. Mahinder Singh
Manoj Kumar Singh vs. Coal India Ltd. and Ors.
Union of India and Anr. vs. Tajinder Singh
Union of India and Anr. vs. R.S. Sharma
Union of India and Ors. vs. K.V. Jankiraman and Ors
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.