SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 1838

R. M. JOSHI
Ravindra – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
B.R.Kedar, Advocate, S.P.Sonpawale, Advocate

JUDGMENT/ORDER

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith.

2. By consent of both the sides, heard fnally at admission stage.

3. This petition under Sec. 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and Sec. 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure takes exception to the order dtd. 13/1/2015, passed in RCC No. 56/2012 dismissing the application for discharge and confrmation of the said order by Additional Sessions Judge in Criminal Revision Application No. 19/2015 vide order dtd. 5/10/2017.

4. Petitioners are medical practitioners. Petitioner No. 1 runs registered Sonography Center in the name and style as "Suvidha Hospital, Maternity Home and Sonography Center" since 2006. Registration certifcate issued in favour of petitioner No. 1 expired in the year 2011 and an application was made for renewal thereof on 14/10/2011. The said certifcate was renewed by order dtd. 3/11/2012 with effect from 17/11/2011 to 16/11/2016. It is the contention of petitioners that prior thereto inspection of the sonography machine was done on 3/12/2011 covering period from 15/5/2011 to 9/6/2011. It is alleged against petitioner No. 1 that there are discrepancies in Form F. On that day, Form F, report fles and MTP regist

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top