SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 2248

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Prakash D.Naik, J.
James Savio Souza - Appellant
Versus
State of Goa - Respondent
Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 575 of 2023 (Filing)
Decided On : 17-08-2023

Advocates appeared:
Arun De Sa, Advocate, Sahil S.Sardesai, Advocate, Pravin N.Faldessai, Advocate, Vibhav R.Amonkar, Advocate

IMPORTANT POINT
The court established that the absence of corroborative evidence and the nature of injuries can influence the decision to grant bail, even in serious criminal cases.

Headnote:

BAIL - CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - The court granted bail to the applicant despite serious allegations, emphasizing the lack of corroborative evidence for the firing incident and the nature of injuries sustained by the complainant. The court highlighted that the applicant's continued detention was not necessary as the investigation was complete, and the chargesheet was yet to be filed, thus allowing for bail under specific conditions.

Fact of the Case:

The applicant was arrested for multiple offences including attempted murder and firearm-related charges after allegedly assaulting the complainant and firing at his staff in a bar. The applicant had been in custody since 13/7/2023, and a bail application was previously rejected.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the investigation was complete, the injuries were minor, and there was no evidence corroborating the firing incident. The applicant had a history of acquittals and pending cases, but the court deemed that further detention was unnecessary.

Issues: Whether the applicant should be granted bail considering the serious nature of the charges and the ongoing investigation.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that the lack of corroborative evidence for the serious charges, the minor nature of the injuries, and the completion of the investigation warranted the granting of bail, despite the applicant's criminal history.

Final Decision: The court allowed the bail application, imposing conditions including a bond, staying out of Bardez Taluka, and not tampering with evidence.

JUDGMENT/ORDER

1. The applicant is arrested on 13/7/2023 in connection with FIR No.106/2023 registered with Anjuna Police Station for offences under Ss. 143, 147, 148, 504, 427, 307 r/w Sec. 149 of Indian Penal Code and Sec. 25 of Arms Act.

2. The case of the prosecution in short is that on 12/7/2023 the applicant and his associates had entered the bar of the complainant and demanded drinks. On refusal, the applicant abused the complainant and his staff. The complainant was assaulted. The applicant fired at the staff of the complainant with a firearm.

3. The applicant was arrested and produced before the concerned Court for remand. Initially, he was remanded to police custody and subsequently to jail custody. The applicant preferred application for bail before the Court of Sessions at Panaji which has been rejected vide order dtd. 25/7/2023.

4. Learned advocate for the applicant submitted that the applicant is in custody from 13/7/2023. The investigation is completed. The applicant is in jail custody. Cross complaint was lodged at the instance of the applicant. Neither the complainant nor any other person suffered any serious injuries. The case of the prosecution that the applicant had fired at witness from firearm is not corroborated by any evidence. Although the applicant was shown to be involved in several cases, most of the cases have resulted in acquittal or 'C' summary report. Two cases are pending before the Court for trial. The applicant is willing to stay out of Bardez Taluka.

5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Mr Faldessai, submitted that chargesheet is yet to be filed. Investigation is in progress. The complainant and the injured person are eyewitnesses to the incident. The complainant had suffered two injuries which is evident from the Hurt Certificate issued by the Directorate of Health Services. The applicant was involved in several cases in the past. He had fired at witness Uday. Empty cartridge was recovered from the spot although bullet mark was not noticed at the spot of the incident.

6. Learned advocate Mr Amonkar appearing for the intervenor in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.609 of 2023(F) submits that specific role has been attributed to the applicant. The applicant was involved in several cases in the past. FIR No.132/2022 was registered for similar offence wherein the applicant has used firearm. The applicant is habitually flashing the firearm. While on bail in the aforesaid case, the applicant has committed the present crime. There is threat to the life of the complainant and the eye witness, in the event the applicant is released on bail. Applicant is not entitled for bail while investigation is in progress. The applicant has committed this crime while on bail in previous case.

7. The applicant is in jail from 13/7/2023. Apparently, the investigation is over although chargesheet is not filed. From the details provided in the application it is apparent that the applicant is acquitted and in some cases 'C' summary is filed. Two cases are pending in the Court. The complainant had suffered injuries in the nature of abrasions which are of simple nature. There are no bullet marks at the scene of offence to corroborate version of the witnesses that there was firing at one of the witness. Sec. 307 IPC is invoked for firing at witness. Although charge under Sec. 307 is debatable, since chargesheet is yet to be filed at this stage, such finding is not warranted. Further detention of the applicant is not necessary. It is also pertinent to note that the firearm which has been purportedly used during the crime is seized and it is in custody of the police. In the circumstances, on certain terms and conditions the applicant can be directed to be released on bail.

ORDER

(i) Criminal application (bail) No.575 of 2023(Filing) is allowed.

(ii) The applicant is directed to be released on bail in connection with FIR No.106/2023 registered with Anjuna Police Station on executing PR bond of ?25,000/- with one or more s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top