SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 2211

G. A. SANAP
Namdeo – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
N.R.Saboo, Advocate, Mayuri Deshmukh, Advocate

JUDGMENT/ORDER

1. Heard.

2. In this revision application, challenge is to the judgment and order dtd. 31/8/2016 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Akola, whereby the learned Sessions Judge dismissed the appeal filed by the applicants/accused Nos. 2 and 3 against their conviction and sentence awarded by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Balapur dtd. 26/2/2013 for the offences punishable under Ss. 197 and 198 read with Sec. 34 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as "I.P.C."). Learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Balapur on conviction had sentenced accused Nos.2 and 3 to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year on both counts and to pay fine of Rs.500.00 each on both counts.

3. The facts are as follows:-

Non-applicant No.2, who died during the pendency of this revision application had filed a complaint in the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Balapur against three accused. In this proceeding after death of complainant, an application was made for bringing on record the legal representatives of the complainant/non-applicant No.2. This Court (Coram :-Manish Pitale, J.), by order dtd. 18/7/2019, rejected the said application by taking not

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top