SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 2227

SARANG V. KOTWAL
Adnan Mehboob Ali Sayyed – Appellant
Versus
Dy. Commissioner of Police – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Arfan Sait, Advocate, Mahesh S.Vadlakonda, Advocate

JUDGMENT/ORDER

1. Heard Mr. Mahesh Vadlakonda, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. Arfan Sait, learned APP for the Respondent-State.

2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith with consent of the parties.

3. The Petitioner has challenged the order dtd. 16/2/2023 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Zone-2, Bhiwandi. By the impugned externment order, the Petitioner was externed from the Districts of Thane, Palghar, Mumbai City, Mumbai Suburban, Navi Mumbai and Raigad for a period of one year. That order was challenged before the Appellate Authority. The Divisional Commissioner, Konkan Division, Mumbai vide his order dtd. 26/6/2023 modified the externment order and the area of externment was restricted only to Thane District. The Petitioner has challenged these orders.

4. Before passing the externment order, the Petitioner was served with a show-cause notice dtd. 25/7/2022 under Sec. 59 of the Maharashtra Police Act (for short, 'said Act') setting-forth the allegations against him. The Petitioner appeared before the inquiry officer on 3/8/2022 and submitted his reply. After considering his reply and the material against him, the impugned order was passed.

5. Learned counsel fo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top