SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

Y. G. KHOBRAGADE
Ashok Bhausaheb Wahul – Appellant
Versus
The Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Manikrao L. Wankhade, Jitendra S. Jain
For the Respondent: C.V. Bhadane

JUDGMENT :

Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, J.

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally with the consent of both the sides.

2. The Petitioner takes exception to the order dated 01.12.2023 passed by the Respondent No. 1, the Divisional Commissioner, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar (Aurangabad) in Externment Appeal No. 2023/G.A./Desk-1/ Pol-1/Externment/CR-70, thereby confirming the order dated 12.06.2023 passed by the Respondent No. 2, the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Aurangabad in proceeding No. PDC/Range-1/V-2/Externment-01-23/Final order/2023-1940 thereby externed the Petitioner from entire District of Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, for the period of two years.

3. On perusal of record, it indicates that the concerned Police Authorities sought to invoke Section 55 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 for the purpose of externment of the Petitioner. On 18.02.2023, the Senior Police Inspector of M.I.D.C. Waluj Police Station, submitted a proposal with the Respondent No. 2 for externing the Petitioner. In pursuance of said proposal, the Petitioner was served with first show cause notice under Section 59 of the Maharashtra Police Act on 17.02.2022. Thereafter, again a second show cause notice under

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top