Back
G. S. KULKARNI, JITENDRA JAIN
Bharat Nagu Garud – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jurisdiction of the caste scrutiny committee (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. details of petitioners' caste validity certificates (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. arguments against review jurisdiction of the committee (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 4. court’s analysis of review powers and jurisdiction (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48) |
| 5. final conclusion on review of caste validity (Para 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62) |
JUDGMENT/ORDER
G.S.KULKARNI, J. - Rule, made returnable forthwith. Respondents waive service. By consent of the parties, heard finally.
2. These are ten petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Each of these petitions assail orders passed by the Caste Scrutiny Committee constituted under the Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Denotified Tribes (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Caste Certificate Act, 2000 (for short, "2000 Act"), whereby the Caste Scrutiny Committee by exe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
