SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 2096

A. S. CHANDURKAR, V. V. JOSHI
Rahul – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
S.V.Bhutada, Advocate, R R.Rajkarne, Advocate, Nilesh Gawande, Advocate, J.B.Kasat, Advocate, A.A.Madiwale, Advocate

JUDGMENT/ORDER

1. The question that arises for consideration in this writ petition is when the post of Sarpanch is reserved for a particular category of members and the Sarpanch elected as such is the only member belonging to that particular category, on removal of such Sarpanch due to passing of a motion of no-confidence under Sec. 35(2)(a) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 (for short, the Act of 1959), whether he/she can again contest the by-election that is held for filling in the vacancy caused due to his/her removal ?

2. The respondent No.6 was elected as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Wathoda, Taluka Warud, District Amravati. The post of Sarpanch was reserved for Scheduled Caste (Women). By a motion of no-confidence moved by the petitioners along with other members of the Gram Panchayat, the respondent No.6 came to be removed from the post of Sarpanch since the said motion came to be passed by the requisite majority. Since a vacancy had arisen on the post of Sarpanch that was reserved for members belonging to Scheduled Caste (Women) category and the respondent No.6 was the only eligible member who could contest the said election, the petitioners have challenged the n

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top