A. S. CHANDURKAR, V. V. JOSHI
Rahul – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT/ORDER
1. The question that arises for consideration in this writ petition is when the post of Sarpanch is reserved for a particular category of members and the Sarpanch elected as such is the only member belonging to that particular category, on removal of such Sarpanch due to passing of a motion of no-confidence under Sec. 35(2)(a) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 (for short, the Act of 1959), whether he/she can again contest the by-election that is held for filling in the vacancy caused due to his/her removal ?
2. The respondent No.6 was elected as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Wathoda, Taluka Warud, District Amravati. The post of Sarpanch was reserved for Scheduled Caste (Women). By a motion of no-confidence moved by the petitioners along with other members of the Gram Panchayat, the respondent No.6 came to be removed from the post of Sarpanch since the said motion came to be passed by the requisite majority. Since a vacancy had arisen on the post of Sarpanch that was reserved for members belonging to Scheduled Caste (Women) category and the respondent No.6 was the only eligible member who could contest the said election, the petitioners have challenged the n
Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale vs. Navnath Tukaram Kakde and ors. (2014) 6 Mh.L.J. 804
Chandarbai w/o Malhari Gaikwad and anr. vs. State of Maharashtra and ors. 1998 (2) Mh.L.J. 724
A Sarpanch removed by a motion of no-confidence is not statutorily barred from contesting a by-election for the same post under the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.
If Sarapnach fails to call such meeting, the Secretary of the panchayat shall forthwith make a report thereof the competent authority and thereupon the competent authority shall call a meeting of the....
The Deputy Commissioner had the authority to order the removal of the petitioner under Section 51(3)(b) of the Haryana Panchayati Raj Act, 1994, as the petitioner did not possess the minimum qualific....
No confidence motion applies to a nominated officiating Sarpanch under the Panchayati Raj Act, ensuring accountability in governance.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the vacant post of Sarpanch, as per the amended second proviso to Section 43 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, must be filled by elec....
The main legal principle established is that the provision for a no confidence motion against a directly elected Sarpanch is rational, reasonable, and in line with democratic principles, providing ac....
A valid Caste Certificate from the state of contest is essential for candidates claiming SC/ST status in elections.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the reservation for the post of Sarpanch was rightly determined by drawing lots from the members belonging to Scheduled Castes category and Ba....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the necessity of ratification in the Gram Sabha for a no confidence motion passed against a directly elected Sarpanch, as per the amended provision....
The immunity from no confidence motions under the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act applies to the post of Sarpanch, not the individual, allowing motions against subsequent Sarpanchs within the stip....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.