SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 2132

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Abhay Ahuja, J.
Mrs. Priyanka Rahul Patil - Appellant
Versus
Rahul Ravindra Patil - Respondent
Miscellaneous Civil Application No. 310 of 2022
Decided On : 15-09-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Akshay Kulkarni, Advocate, for the Applicant; Mr.Shrikant Bhilare i/by Meraki Legal, Advocate, for the Respondent.

IMPORTANT POINT
In matrimonial proceedings, the convenience of the wife must be prioritized over that of the husband, especially when considering the transfer of divorce proceedings, taking into account the socio-economic and personal circumstances of both parties.

Headnote:

DIVORCE - TRANSFER OF PROCEEDINGS - Hindu Marriage Act, 1955; Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Section 24 - The court emphasized the principle that in matrimonial matters, the convenience of the wife should be prioritized over that of the husband when considering the transfer of divorce proceedings. The court referenced previous judgments that established this principle, highlighting the socio-economic context and the specific hardships faced by the wife, including her health condition and responsibilities towards her child and parents. The court concluded that transferring the proceedings to a more accessible location for the wife was necessary to ensure justice.

Fact of the Case:

The Applicant-wife sought to transfer divorce proceedings initiated by the Respondent-husband from the Family Court at Nashik to the Civil Judge Senior Division at Jaysingpur, citing her health issues, responsibilities towards her daughter and elderly parents, and the significant travel distance involved.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the Applicant-wife's health condition, her role as a caregiver, and the impracticality of traveling 468 kilometers to Nashik justified the transfer of proceedings. The court noted that the Respondent-husband's willingness to cover travel expenses did not mitigate the undue hardship faced by the Applicant-wife.

Issues: Whether the divorce proceedings should be transferred from Nashik to Jaysingpur based on the convenience and circumstances of the Applicant-wife.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reiterated that in matrimonial matters, the convenience of the wife is paramount when considering the transfer of proceedings, as established in previous Supreme Court rulings. The court emphasized that the specific circumstances of the wife, including her health and familial responsibilities, warranted the transfer.

Final Decision: The court allowed the Application to transfer the divorce proceedings from the Family Court at Nashik to the Civil Judge Senior Division at Jaysingpur, permitting the Respondent-husband to appear via video conferencing when his physical presence was not required.

ORAL JUDGMENT

1. This is an Application seeking transfer of Divorce proceedings filed by the Respondent-husband for dissolution of marriage before the Family Court at Nashik to the Civil Judge Senior Division, Jaysingpur, District Kolhapur.

2. Mr.Akshay Kulkarni, learned Counsel for the Applicant-wife, submits that the marriage between the Applicant-wife and Respondent husband was solemnized on 29th November 2012 at Ankali, Taluka Miraj, District Sangli. That, after marriage, the Applicant-wife and Respondent-husband started cohabiting at the Applicant's matrimonial home at Nashik. It is submitted that on 19th November 2013 a girl child was born out of the wedlock. That, on 27th October 2015, the Applicant-wife was diagnosed with Type 1 Diabetes and that the Applicant-wife was required to take insulin everyday. It is submitted that during the period from the date of solemnization of the marriage till 2nd June 2018, there were several quarrels between the Applicantwife and the Respondent-husband and finally on 2nd June 2018, the Applicant-wife left the matrimonial home and came to stay with her parents at Jaysingpur at her parental home.

3. Thereafter, on 21st August 2019, the Applicant-wife filed proceedings under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, before the Judicial Magistrate First Class Court (JMFC) at Jaysingpur for maintenance. The Respondent-husband filed a reply in the said proceedings. After hearing the parties, the JMFC Court has awarded monthly maintenance of Rs.10,000/- for the daughter and a maintenance of Rs.3,000/- for the Applicant-wife, which was until April 2020. That, on 23rd March 2022, the Respondent-husband has filed Divorce proceedings for dissolution of the marriage between the Applicant-wife and Respondent-husband before the Family Court at Nashik.

4. Mr.Kulkarni, learned Counsel for the Applicant-wife, would submit that soon after receipt of the summons, the Applicant-wife has filed this Miscellaneous Civil Application on 13th July 2022 seeking transfer of the Divorce proceedings from the Family Court Nashik to the Court of Civil Judge Senior Division, Jaysingpur.

5. Mr.Kulkarni would submit that the Applicant-wife is residing with her school going daughter and old parents at Jaysingpur. He would submit that although the Applicant-wife is qualified as a Bachelor of Engineering, as of now, she is only looking after her daughter and aged parents and is neither employed nor engaged in any professional work. He would submit that she is dependent on her parents for her sustenance. Learned Counsel would submit that the Applicant-wife is diabetic, which has been admitted by the Respondent-husband in the Domestic Violence proceedings as well as in the reply filed to this Application. That, the distance between Nashik and Jaysingpur is 468 kilometers one way and it would take three days for her to go and come from Nashik. Besides, considering her diabetic condition, she cannot travel alone and has no one to travel with her to Nashik. Additionally, as stated earlier, she also has her responsibility towards her daughter and old parents. The Court of Civil Judge Senior Division at Jaysingpur is ten kilometers away from where she is staying at her parental home. Therefore, the Applicant-wife would not only be inconvenienced by travelling to and fro from Jaysingpur to Nashik but the said travel would also cause undue hardship to her. On the other hand, the Respondent-husband is a Senior Government Officer, having all resources at his disposal to travel to Jaysingpur. Therefore, no such inconvenience would be caused to the Respondent-husband if he has to come to Jaysingpur. Learned Counsel would submit that proceedings before the Nashik Court are at the stage of appearance and counselling.

6. Mr.Kulkarni for the Applicant-wife has relied upon the decision of this Court in the case of Devika Dhiraj Patil nee Devika Jayprakash Buttepatil vs. Dhiraj Sunil Patil,[Miscellaneous Civil Application No.167 o

            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
            1
            2
            3
            4
            5
            6
            7
            8
            9
            10
            11
            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
            supreme today icon
            logo-black

            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

            Please visit our Training & Support
            Center or Contact Us for assistance

            qr

            Scan Me!

            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

            whatsapp-icon Back to top