ARUN R. PEDNEKER
Employees State Insurance Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Dinendra Ratansi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr. Pathak, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Naidu, learned counsel for Respondent Nos. 1(a) to 1(d).
2. By the present appeal, the appellant – Employees State Insurance Corporation (for short “ESIC”) challenges the order passed by the Employees Insurance Court, Mumbai dated 01.08.1988 in ESIC Application No. 130 of 1998, whereby the ESIC Court set aside the Order of ESIC in Form No. C-19, directing the occupier of the factory to pay ESIC dues in his personal capacity.
3. The questions of law that arises for consideration in the present appeal under Section 82 of the ESIC Act is as under :
4. The facts giving rise to the appeal are summarised as under :
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.