JUDGMENT :

(S.G. Mehare, J.) :

1. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for the respondent-State.

2. The applicant seeks bail in Crime No.69 of 2023, registered with Sillod City Police Station, District Aurangabad, of the offences punishable under Sections 120-B, 182, 193, 419, 420, 468 read with Section 34 of the IPC.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant has vehemently argued that the trial is not concluded within 60 days from the first date fixed for taking evidence. A few witnesses were examined, and thereafter, the trial was stalled for no satisfactory reasons. Since the trial was not concluded within 60 days from the first date fixed for taking evidence, he deserves bail under Section 437(6) of the Cr.P.C. He relied on the case of Chandraswami and another Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation ; (1996) 6 Supreme Court Cases 751. He also relied on the case of Sukhdev Singh Vs. State of Punjab ; 2009 Cri.L.J. 2941. Relying on these judgments, he would submit that since the trial has been delayed for no cause at the hands of the applicant, the applicant deserves bail. He would submit that the learned Trial Court rejected the bail application on the incorrect groun