SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 2345

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT AURANGABAD BENCH
Mangesh S. Patil, S.G. Chapalgaonkar, JJ.
M/s B.R. Ande Construction Company - Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra and Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition No. 369 of 2023
Decided On : 20-02-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Miss Pradnya Talekar, Advocate i/by Talekar & Associates
For the Respondent: Mr. S.B. Yawalkar, AGP

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Tendering process - Judicial review - The petitioner seeks to quash the tender summary report declaring its bid as 'not admitted' and to open the financial bid of petitioner for a specific construction project. The petitioner argues compliance with eligibility criteria outlined in the tender and claims arbitrary disqualification. The court finds the petitioner failed to meet the requisite qualifications, reaffirming that the tendering authority is best suited to interpret its terms and that courts should only intervene in cases of gross arbitrariness or mala fide actions. (Paras 1, 14, 16)

(B) Ineligibility Criteria - The court states that the work order date is crucial in determining eligibility pertaining to completed works within the last seven years as specified by the tender notice conditions, and emphasizes that it will not substitute its judgment for the decision of the tendering authority unless significant procedural flaws exist. (Paras 12, 14)

Table of Content
1. requirements for tender compliance (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. disqualification based on tender criteria (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
3. arguments regarding eligibility and discrimination (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
4. judicial review limitations in tender matters (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
5. conclusion dismissing the writ petition (Para 15 , 16)

JUDGMENT :

S.G. Chapalgaonkar, J.

The petitioner, partnership firm approaches this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with following prayers :-

    A. To quash and set aside the tender summary report showing the petitioners bid as being "not admitted:fee/ PreQual/Technical" updated on 06.01.2023, by issuing a writ of certiorari or any other direction, writ or order as the case may be;

    B. To direct the respondent No.2 to open the financial bid of the petitioner along with other successful bidders, for e-tender B-2 notice no.LTR-2/11/2022-23 for Construction of Railway over bridge Ahmedpur Shirur (Tajband) Udgir Road, on SH 249, Km. 1/200 near Malkapur on Udgir By-pass road, Tq. Udgir, Dist. Latur, by issuing a writ of mandamus or any other direction, writ or order as the case may be;

2. The petitioner avers that the tender notice dated 20-10-2022 was issued by respondents for construction of railway over bridge, Ahmedpur-Shirur (Tajband) - Udgir Road, on SH 249, Dist. Latur with an estimated cost of Rs. 28.00 crores and 24 months period of execution of work .

3. The tender notice prescribes qualifying criteria in clause (4). The clause 4.2 provides for the information and documents to be included with the bids in section (2). The sub clause (b) and (c) states as under :-

    (b) Total monetary value of construction work performed for each of the last Seven years;

    (c) Experience in works of a similar nature and size for each of the last Seven years and details of works underway or contractually committed and clients who may be contacted for further information on those contracts;

    4. The clause No. 4.4 reads as under :-

    4.4 A. To qualify for award of the contract, each bidder in its name should have in the last Seven years as referred to in Appendix.

    (a) Achieved a minimum annual financial turnover during any last seven years (in all classes of civil engineering, construction works only) of value not less than Rs.1078.88 lakhs in any one year. In support of this, scanned copy of annual Audit report certified by Chartered Accountant should be produced.

    (b) Satisfactorily completed any civil work (from start to finish) during last seven years. It should have been commissioned and completed during last seven years i.e. 2015-2016, 2016-2017, 2017-2018, 2018-2019, 2019-2020, 2020-2021, 2021-2022 of at least:-

    i. Three similar works each having minimum estimated cost of Rs.1150.80 Lakhs at price level 2022-23.

    or

    ii. Two similar works each having minimum estimated cost of Rs. 1438.51 Lakhs at price level 2022- 23.

    iii. One similar work of value not less than Rs.2301.61 Lakhs at price level 2022-23.

    (Financial turnover and cost of completed works of previous years shall be given weightage of 10% per year based on Rupee Value to bring them to 2022-23 price level.)

4. The petitioner in compliance with the aforesaid condition submitted the work completed/in hand certificate as under :-

Sr.No.

Name of Work

Name and Address of the Organisation

Place and Country

Agreement No.

Tendered Cost

Total cost of Work Done

Date of Completion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

1

Construction of Railway Over Bridge Across Railway Crossing on Akola Dabki Gaigaon Road Dist. Akola

Executive Engineer, P.W.D. Division Akola

Akola, Maharashtra, India

B-1/326/DL/ 2016-17

147885618

19,93,00,007.85

2021-22

2

Construction of Railway Over bridge Approaches, Service Road, Diversion Road on Shirur Udgir Bidar Road SH217 at Km. 34/700 (Railway Km No.169/6-7 L.C.No.82) Tq. Udgir Dist. Latur

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top