SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Bom) 1012

Y. G. KHOBRAGADE
Administrator City and Industrial Development Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Pradeep – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : A.S. Bajaj, Adv.

ORDER :

(Y.G. Khobragade, J.)

1. By the present Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the Appellant/original Defendant is challenging the Judgment and Decree dated 10.08.1998 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Aurangabad in appeal bearing R.C.A. No. 146 of 1993 whereby the Judgment and decree dated 22.12.1989 passed by the learned Civil Judge Junior Division, Aurangabad in Suit bearing R.C.S. No.489 of 1986, came to be quashed and set aside and thereby allowed the Suit of present Respondent/original Plaintiff seeking direction to the present Appellant/original Defendant to pay the damages to the tune of Rs. 5,000/-.

2. Present Appellant is the original Defendant and present Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 are the original plaintiffs Nos. 1 and 2 in suit bearing R.C.S. No.489 of 1986. (For the sake of brevity, I would like to refer the parties to the present appeal in their original nomenclature).

3. On 25.02.1999, present Appeal was admitted on substantial questions of law as described in Ground Nos. VI & VII of the Appeal Memo which reads as under :

    (i) That the learned court below has committed an error, in holding that the Cidco, being the Government agency,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top