SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Bom) 1073

S. G. MEHARE
Rekha – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Patil Nileshsingh J.
For the Respondent: Mrs. M.L. Sangit, Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar

JUDGMENT :

S.G. Mehare, J.

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally with the consent of parties.

2. Respondent no.5 was served, but he did not appear. Hence, proceeded ex-parte against him.

3. The petitioner was the Sarpanch of Village Panchayat. She was removed under Section 14 (1) (J-3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958 ('Act of 1958' for short). It was alleged against her that her family had encroached upon the land adjacent to their property, No.169. The Block Development Officer had measured the plot/property No.169 and recorded the finding that 96 sq. ft. land adjacent to the house of the petitioner's family was encroached. They have constructed the washroom and wall compound on encroached land. It was an encroachment on the public road. Based upon the report of the Block Development Officer, the District Collector declared her disqualified from continuing as a member of the Panchayat under Section 14 (1) (J-3) of the Act of 1958. She had preferred an appeal before the Additional Commissioner, Aurangabad. He upheld the judgment and order of the Collector.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently argued that before the so-called measurement of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top