SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SHAILESH P. BRAHME, S. G. MEHARE
Shejal Bahuuddeshiya Shikshan Sanstha – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: V.D. Salunke
For the Respondents: P.S. Patil, R.O. Awasarmol

JUDGMENT :

SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.

1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. With the consent of parties heard both sides finally at the admission stage.

2. Petitioner is a minority educational institution aspiring to open a new college, has approached this Court seeking direction for grant of permission to open a new college at village Babargaon, Tq. Gangapur, Dist. Aurangabad from the academic year 2019-2020 and seeking quashment of action refusing to grant permission to open the college.

3. The petition is filed on 12.02.2019. By order dated 06.03.2019 notices were issued for final disposal, returnable on 03.04.2019. The respondent No. 2-university did not file reply despite opportunities were given to it. The respondent No. 1 also sought many adjournments for filing reply. Ultimately, on 09.02.2021 reply was filed. At the outset, it is necessary to disclose that we are considering the prayer of the petitioner to open a new college which was made for academic year 2019-2020, when academic year 2024-2025 is in progress.

4. It is the case of the petitioner that it is a minority institution. In annual plan of 2019-2020 the location of Babargaon, Tq. Gangapur, Dist. Aurangabad was incor

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top