IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
Dhiraj Singh Thakur, T. Mallikarjuna Rao, JJ.
Vignan Education Development Society - Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh - Respondent
Writ Appeal No. 670 of 2022
Decided On : 12-10-2023
Private Universities - Establishment and Regulation - The Andhra Pradesh Private Universities (Establishment and Regulation) Act, 2016 - Sec. 3, Sec. 6, Sec. 7, Sec. 8, Sec. 10, Sec. 11
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners applied to establish a private University under The Andhra Pradesh Private Universities (Establishment and Regulation) Act, 2016. The Government issued a Letter of Intent with conditions, and the petitioners initiated the process of issuing advertisements for admission. The Government later informed the petitioners that the advertisements contained wrong information and were unlawful, directing them to withdraw the process of admissions.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the Letter of Intent did not grant full-fledged permission, and the Government should have taken a decision based on the petitioners' communication. The court directed the Government to grant permission if satisfied with the petitioners' compliance or intimate the compliance to be made by the petitioners.
Issues: The main issue was whether the Letter of Intent granted permission to the petitioners to start classes and make admissions in the University.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the Letter of Intent did not convert the applicant into a University and that the Government was entitled to ensure compliance with the conditions before permitting the petitioners to proceed with admissions.
Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, and the court held that the Government was entitled to satisfy itself regarding the petitioners' compliance with the conditions of the Letter of Intent before permitting the petitioners to start classes and make admissions.
JUDGMENT
DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CJ. - The present writ appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent has been preferred against the judgment and order, dtd. 1/8/2022 passed in W.P.No.9218 of 2020.
2. Briefly stated the material facts are as under:
2.1 The Andhra Pradesh State legislative assembly, enacted The Andhra Pradesh Private Universities (Establishment and Regulation) Act, 2016 (for short "the Act"), with the object of providing high quality, research oriented and industry relevant higher education. Sec. 3 (1) of the said Act, vested the Government with the power to permit the establishment of a University by inclusion of a name and location of a University, the name and address of the sponsoring body and the details of its registration in the Schedule to the Act.
2.2 Sec. 3 (8) of the Act envisages that each such University shall be a body corporate by the name included in the Schedule and shall have perpetual succession and common seal with power, subject to the provisions of this Act, to acquire and hold property, to contract and shall, by the said name, sue or be sued.
2.3 Sec. 6 of the Act envisages that a body desirous of establishment of a private University shall make an application to the Government, containing, among other things, an outline of the purpose and vision of the proposed private University, the proposal and the Project Report in such manner, with such particulars and along with such a fee as may be prescribed.
2.4 Sec. 7 of the Act further envisages the submission of additional information such as the financial resources of the sponsoring body, the name, the location and headquarters of the proposed University, the track record experience and expertise of the sponsoring body in specific disciplines, plan for precommencement activities, including in academic and non-academic areas, the proposed fee structure and the concessions or rebates in fee and scholarships to the core students from economically poor or socially backward families, including Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes, other backward classes and physically challenged students etc., as also proposed approach and initial plan for academic and research excellence, including accreditations to be sought.
2.5 Sec. 8 (1) envisages the constitution of an expert committee by the Government consisting of such persons as may be prescribed, to examine the application received under Sec. 6 and 7. Sec. 8 (2) further envisages that the expert committee shall consider the proposal and project report based on the information given under Sec. 6 and 7 and recommend or otherwise whether the proposal to set up a private University is acceptable and whether the sponsoring body is competent to set up and manage the university.
2.6 Sec. 10 (1) envisages that, after the receipt of recommendations of the expert committee, the Government shall, as far as possible within a period of 30 days, take a decision on accepting, rejecting or seeking modifications in the proposal and project report. While the proviso to Sec. 10 (1) envisages that the Government may consider the additional measures as recommended by the expert committee under Sec. 9.
2.7 Sec. 10 (2) envisages that the Government shall inform the sponsoring body about its decision within 10 days of taking such decision, through a Letter of Intent, a Letter of Regret, or a letter seeking additional clarifications.
2.8 Ss. 10 and 11 of the Act, for facility of reference are reproduced here under:
"10. Letter of Intent - (1) After receipt of the recommendations of the Expert Committee under Sec. 8, the Government shall, as far as possible within a period of 30 days, take a decision on accepting, rejecting, or seeking modifications in the proposal and project report;
Provided that Government may consider the additional measures as recommended by the Expert Committee under Sec. 9;
(2) The Government shall inform the Sponsoring Body about it's decision within 10 days of taking such decision, through a Letter of Inten
The issuance of a Letter of Intent does not grant full-fledged permission to establish a University, and the Government is entitled to ensure compliance with the conditions before permitting the peti....
The exercise of discretion by the State Government under Section 109(3)(d) of the Maharashtra Public Universities Act, 2016 must be judicious and reasons must be recorded for granting or refusing Let....
The court affirmed that decisions by the State regarding educational institutions must be justified, not arbitrary, ensuring the criteria for granting permissions are relevant and applied consistentl....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the government must have exceptional circumstances and valid reasons, recorded in writing, to overrule negative recommendations from the Unive....
[The court established that the Maharashtra Public Universities Act mandates strict adherence to the perspective plan when granting permissions for new colleges, and any deviation from this requireme....
Procedural compliance in educational affiliations is critical; failure to follow mandatory guidelines leads to nullification of approval for new colleges.
The court established that adherence to the perspective plan is mandatory for the issuance of Letters of Intent for new colleges under the Maharashtra Public Universities Act 2016.
The authority has discretion to reject educational proposals based on deficiencies, and such proposals cannot be considered after the relevant academic year has passed.
State-imposed conditions for educational affiliation that contradict AICTE approval undermine institutional autonomy and are unconstitutional.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.