IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
SANDEEP V. MARNE, J
Kalavati Rajendra Kokale - Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary Rural - Respondent
WP/14121/2024
Decided On : 29-01-2025
(A) Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1950 - Sections 29 and 34 - Resignation of Sarpanch - Resignation tendered by Sarpanch was withdrawn during verification meeting - Collector erroneously declared vacancy - Resignation does not take effect if withdrawn before confirmation - Right to withdraw resignation recognized. (Paras 6, 10, 22, 23)
(B) Withdrawal of Resignation - A Sarpanch can withdraw resignation before it takes effect - No need to file a dispute if resignation is withdrawn - Meeting must terminate upon withdrawal. (Paras 20, 22)
Facts of the case:
The Petitioner, elected Sarpanch, resigned but withdrew during the verification meeting. The Collector declared a vacancy despite the withdrawal, prompting the Petitioner to challenge this order. (Paras 2, 4)
Findings of Court:
The resignation did not take effect as it was withdrawn before confirmation, and the Collector's order was set aside. (Paras 23)
Issues: Whether a resignation takes effect if withdrawn during verification and if a dispute must be filed to prevent its effect. (Paras 1)
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that a resignation can be withdrawn before it takes effect, and no dispute is necessary if the resignation is withdrawn. (Paras 22)
Result: Petition allowed; resignation not effective, and election of new Sarpanch set aside. (Paras 23)
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. whether resignation tendered (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioner has filed this petition (Para 2) |
| 3. facts of the case in narrow (Para 3) |
| 4. in the above background (Para 4 , 5) |
| 5. mr. patil, the learned counsel (Para 6 , 7) |
| 6. the petition is opposed by ms. kapadia (Para 8) |
| 7. rival contentions of the parties (Para 9) |
| 8. the first issue that arises (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 9. however, this court has repeatedly held (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 10. petition accordingly succeeds (Para 23 , 24) |
JUDGMENT :
1. Petition raises following two broad issues:–
(i) Whether resignation tendered by Sarpanch would take effect if the same is withdrawn at the time when it is taken up for verification in the Gram Panchayat meeting?
(ii) For preventing the resignation to take effect, whether filing of Dispute under the provisions of Section 29(3) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1950 is necessary by a Sarpanch who has already withdrawn the resignation?
2. Petitioner has filed this Petition challenging order dated 7 June 2024 passed by the Collector, Raigad for declaring that a vacancy has occurred on the post of Sarpanch of village Ainghar, Taluka-Roha, District Raigad and appointing returning officer to conduct elections for vacant post of Sarpanch. Petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the Collector in treating that her resignation on the post of Sarpanch has taken effect under the provisions of Section 29 of the Village Panchayats Act, even though she had withdrawn the resignation during the meeting of the Gram Panchayat convened for verification of her resignation.
3. Facts of the case in narrow compass. Election of Gram Panchayat, Aindhar, Taluka-Roha, District-Raigad were conducted in February 2021. Petitioner was elected as a Member of the Gram Panchayat in the elections. The post of Sarpanch was reserved for backward class women. Petitioner was elected as Sarpanch from amongst elected Members of the Gram Panchayat on 10 February 2021. It is the case of the Petitioner that she was forced to resign from the post of Sarpanch on 5 March 2024 and submitted her letter of resignation to the Chairman of the Panchayat Samiti. In a similar manner, Upsarpanch also tendered his resignation on the same day. For verifying the resignations submitted by Petitioner and the Upsarpanch, meeting of the Gram Panchayat was convened vide letter dated 7 March 2024 and the same was held on 15 March 2024. The resignation submitted by Upasarpach was scrutinised and confirmed. However, when resignation letter of Petitioner was taken up for discussion, she withdrew the same during the course of meeting dated 15 March 2024. Accordingly, withdrawal of resignation was recorded in the minute book and minutes of the meeting were sent to higher authorities for taking further action. On same day i.e. 15 March 2024 Petitioner in her capacity as Sarpanch and the Gram Vikas Officer, jointly submitted letter dated 15 March 2024 to Block Development Officer (BDO) informing him about withdrawal of resignation by Petitioner and forwarded to him the minutes of the meeting dated 15 March 2024. The BDO, in turn forwarded the letter dated 15 March 2024 to Tehsildar together with minutes of the meeting dated 15 March 2024 by his letter dated 5 April 2024. In the meantime, Petitioner continued functioning as Sarpanch and participated in the meeting held on 8 April 2024 in which new Upasarpach was elected. This was done by her on an assumption that her resignation had not taken effect on account of its withdrawal.
4. In the above background, it appears that copy of the letter dated 5 April 2024 sent by BDO to Tehsildar reached the office of Collector, Raigad, who took cognizance thereof and passed order dated 7 June 2024 recording that Petitioner’s resignation has been accepted by Chairman, Pachayat Samiti, Roha, and that the posts of Sarpanch and Upsarpanch are vacant on 13 June 2024. Petitioner is aggrieved by Collector’s order dated 7 June 2024 and has accord
A Sarpanch's resignation can be withdrawn before it takes effect, and no dispute is necessary to prevent its effect if withdrawn during the verification meeting.
Strict compliance with resignation procedures under the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act is mandatory; failure to adhere renders the resignation invalid, especially when disputed.
Strict compliance with resignation procedures under the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act is mandatory; failure to adhere renders the resignation invalid, especially when disputed.
Point of Law : Court is of considered view that office of President of Karimganj Zilla Parishad did not cease to have been vacated by petitioner at any point of time, contrary to view held by State r....
The Election Commission should ensure transparency and provide an opportunity for cross-examination in resignation disputes.
The court emphasized that only genuine and voluntary resignations can be accepted by the Speaker, and failure to investigate claims of coercion prior to acceptance is a fundamental flaw. This establi....
An employee can withdraw a resignation before it becomes effective, even if accepted, as long as the employer-employee relationship persists.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.