IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
M.S. Sonak, Jitendra Jain, JJ
Sanjay Patel – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Jitendra Jain, J.
1. This petition is instituted by the petitioner challenging an order passed under Section 148A(d) and notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’), both dated 28 March 2024 for the assessment year 2017-18.
Brief facts :-
2. The petitioner is an individual and has filed his return of income for assessment year 2017-18 on 3 August 2017. The said return of income was selected for scrutiny by issuing a notice under Section 142(1) of the Act for examining the claim of deduction under Section 57 of the Act. In the petition at Exhibit ‘C’, there is a copy of the email response submitted by the petitioner during the course of original assessment proceedings in which reference is made to evidence in support of the nexus between the income from other sources and deduction against that income. However, surprisingly, the enclosures to this Exhibit ‘C’ are not annexed in the present petition.
3. On 24 December 2019, an assessment order under Section 143(3) of the Act came to be passed accepting the returned income. The said assessment order does not refer to the response filed by the petitioner at Exhibit ‘C’ to the petition. Still, it states that th
Reopening of assessment under Section 148 is valid based on audit objections if the taxpayer fails to provide timely responses or necessary documentation.
Reassessment under Income Tax Act is impermissible on issues already addressed in a completed assessment, as it constitutes a change of opinion without new material evidence.
Reopening of income assessment under Section 148 is impermissible without fresh material and cannot be based on previously examined issues under Section 263.
Reopening of assessment beyond four years without fresh tangible material or proper disposal of objections is illegal under the Income Tax Act.
Reopening of assessment under Section 148 is impermissible if the issues were previously examined under Section 263 without fresh material.
Reassessment under Section 148 is impermissible if the issues were previously examined, constituting a change of opinion.
Reassessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act is impermissible if the issues were previously examined during the original assessment, as it constitutes a change of opinion.
The challenge to a notice and order for reopening of assessment is maintainable when there is no statutory remedy available under the Act. Non-supply of material forming the basis for reopening the a....
Reopening of assessment under Section 148 is invalid if based on materials already available during the original assessment, constituting a mere change of opinion without fresh evidence.
The Assessing Officer is mandated to dispose of objections to reassessment notices by a speaking order before proceeding with the assessment.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.