PANKAJ MITHAL, REKHA BORANA
Micro Marbles Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Office of the Income Tax Officer Ward-1, Chittorgarh, Rajasthan – Respondent
ORDER :
Pankaj Mithal, J.
1. Petitioner is a private limited company engaged in manufacturing of marble slabs and tiles. It filed its income tax return for the assessment year 2017-2018 and the same was processed under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) and an intimation regarding acceptance of ‘nil’ tax liability was issued to it on 22.06.2018 by the Centralized Processing Centre of the Income Tax Department.
2. The petitioner received a notice dated 30.03.2021 under Section 148 of the Act for reopening of its assessment for the year 2017-2018 on the ground that there are reasons to believe that its income for the relevant year has escaped assessment.
3. On petitioner’s request, it was supplied with the reasons for issuing the said notice vide letter dated 24.05.2021. The said reasons stated that the petitioner had received bogus loan/sale/purchase amount of Rs.93,21,520/- (Rs.89,97,520+ Rs.3,24,000) from M/s. Sanmati Gems Private Limited as per the information received from the Deputy Director of Income Tax, Investigation, Unit-4(4), Mumbai.
4. The petitioner on receipt of the above reasons for reopening its case under Section 148 of the
Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. vs. Chhabil Dass Agarwal
Calcutta Discount Company Limited Vs. Income Tax Officer, Companies District, I & Ors.
Raymond Woollen Mills Limited vs. Income Tax Officer, Centre Circle XI
GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer, (2002) 125 Taxman 963 (SC)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.