IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ.
National Federation of Atomic Energy Employees (NFAEE) - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondents
Writ Petition No.12666 of 2024
Decided on : 15-04-2025
(A) Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964 - Rule 15 - Trade Unions Act, 1926 - Petitioners challenge restrictions imposed by the Government on union elections, claiming violation of democratic rights and statutory provisions - Court finds that no employer can impose restrictions on trade union elections, affirming the autonomy of trade unions in conducting their internal affairs. (Paras 16-20)
(B) Constitutional Law - Article 19(1)(c) - Right to form associations - The court emphasizes that the right to contest elections within a trade union is protected under the Constitution, and any employer-imposed restrictions are undemocratic and arbitrary. (Paras 18-21)
Facts of the case:
Petitioners, representing trade unions under the Trade Unions Act, challenge the office memorandum restricting government employees from holding elective office without prior permission, arguing it undermines democratic rights.
Findings of Court:
The court rules that the restrictions imposed by the government are unconstitutional and violate the rights of union members to contest elections.
Issues: The main issues addressed include the applicability of Rule 15 of the CCS Conduct Rules to trade unions and the legality of the restrictions imposed by the government.
Ratio Decidendi: The court holds that trade unions have the right to self-governance and that any restrictions imposed by the employer on the election process are invalid.
Result: Petition allowed.
JUDGMENT :
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by the consent of the parties.
2. The Petitioners have put forth prayer clauses (a), (b), (c), (d) and (e), as under:-
“(a) That this Hon'ble Court be pleased to hold and declare that the Rule 15 of the Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules 1964 is not applicable to the associations or trade unions whose membership is restricted to the employees working in the Department of Atomic Energy or in any Ministry or department of the Government of India and there is no requirement for seeking prior permission of the employer to become a office bearers of such association or trade union or federation.
(b) That this Hon'ble Court be pleased to hold and declare that the insistence of the DAE of a restricted tenure of 2 terms or 5 years maximum to be office bearers of such service associations/unions/federations is restrictive arbitrary and in violation of the statutory Central Civil Services (Recognition of Service Association) Rules 1993 and liable to be struck down.
(c) That this Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondents and specifically the Department of Atomic Energy not to insist upon the employees working in the said Department to take prior permission under Rule 15 of the CCS Conduct Rules to become members or office bearers or stand for office of office bearers of recognized association and trade unions and federations in the said department and which is restricted to the employees of the said Department only;
(d) That this Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the Respondents and specifically the Department of Atomic Energy not to restrict the tenure of the office bearers of the recognized service association/unions/federations to 2 terms or 5 years maximum”
3. Petitioner No.1 is a National Federation of Atomic Energy Employees working in the department of Atomic Energy and its constituent units all over the country. It is a registered federation under the Trade Unions Act, 1926 and also a recognized association representing the non-gazetted employees in the department of Atomic Energy and its constituent Units, for several decades. The Trade Unions Registration Certificate dated 2nd February, 2000 is placed on record.
4. Petitioner No.2 is the Atomic Energy Workers and Staff Union representing the non-gazetted employees working in Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, a department of Atomic Energy. It is a Registered Trade Union having been issued with the Registration Certificate on 15th July, 1993.
5. The grievance of the Petitioners is the office memorandum dated 5th August, 2019, issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Personnel Public Grievances and Pensions, Department of Personnel and Training, vide which, the Under Secretary to the Government of India has imposed certain restrictions u/Rule 15(1)(c) of the CCS (conduct) Rules, 1964 (hereinafter referred to as the 1964 Rules). It is ordered that no government servant shall, except with the previous sanction of the Government, hold an elective office or canvas for a candidate or candidates for an elective office in any body, whether incorporated or not.
6. For ready reference, paragraphs 1 to 4 of the office memorandum dated 5th August, 2019, are reproduced herein under:-
“ The undersigned is directed to say that as per Rule 15 (1) (c) of the CCS (Conduct) Rules, 1964, no Government servant shall except with the previous sanction of the Government, hold an elective office, or canvass for a candidate or candidates for an elective office, in any body, whether incorporated or not. DoPT's O.M. No. 11013/9/93-Estt.(A) dated 22.04.1994 had also stipulated that no Government servant should be allowed to hold elective office in any sports association/federation for a term of more than 4 years, or for one term whiche
Trade unions have the constitutional right to self-governance, and employer-imposed restrictions on election processes are unconstitutional.
The Registrar of Trade Unions cannot impose restrictions contrary to the Trade Unions Act, allowing retired employees to serve as office bearers within stipulated limits.
Point of law: Election dispute which is sought to be resolved, the Division Bench was of the view that, the election dispute in a trade union need not be interfered with by the writ Court.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the right of the members of a trade union to elect their office-bearers and the management's lack of authority to impose arbitrary restrictions ....
Statutory remedies should be exhausted before seeking writ relief; election eligibility must adhere to defined criteria as per issued Circulars.
The registered union shall be allowed to participate in the election, but the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties are binding.
The Code of Discipline and criteria for recognition of union agreed upon by the Management and Unions is binding upon the petitioner, and the court cannot re-legislate the agreed terms and conditions....
The court established that retired employees cannot be arbitrarily excluded from union representation in grievance redressal processes, affirming their rights under the Trade Unions Act and Industria....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.