IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
M.S.SONAK, ADVAIT M.SETHNA
Imax Corporation – Appellant
Versus
E-City Entertainment (I) Pvt. Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
M. S. Sonak, J.
1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
PRELIMINARIES
2. This Commercial Arbitration Appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated October 24, 2024 passed by the learned Single Judge disposing of Commercial Arbitration Petition No. 414 of 2018 along with Chamber Summons No. 99 of 2019, 100 of 2019 and 101 of 2019 under Sections 47 to 49 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (said Act), thereby refusing to recognise and enforce three foreign arbitral awards dated February 09, 2006, August 24, 2007 and March 27, 2008 [foreign awards] made by the ICC Arbitral Tribunal
3. The 2nd and 3rd Respondents objected to the maintainability of this Appeal. By order dated April 23, 2025, made by the Coordinate Bench of this Court comprising A. S. Chandurkar, J (as His Lordship then was) and M. M. Sathaye, J, rejected the objections regarding maintainability and admitted this Appeal qua all the Respondents.
4. This Court’s order dated April 23, 2025, rejecting the objections to maintainability and admitting this Appeal was challenged inter alia by the first Respondent by instituting Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. (s) 22422 of 2025 before th
Government of India V/s. Vedanta Ltd.
Balwant Rai Saluja & Ors. V/s. Air India Ltd. & Ors.
Hindustan Construction Company Ltd & Anr. V/s. Union of India & Ors
Satyadhyan Ghosal V/s. Deorajin Debi
Bhanu Kumar Jain V/s. Archana Kumar
Mathura Prasad Bajoo Jaiswal and Ors V/s. Dossibai N. B. Jeejeebhoy
Noharlal Verma V/s. Dist. Cooperative Central Bank Ltd.
Canara Bank V/s. N.G. Subbaraya Setty
Nilima Srivastava V/s. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
Naresh Shridhar Mirajkar & Ors Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
Rupa Ashok Hurra V/s. Ashok Hurra
Union of India V/s. S. P. 17 Sharma & Ors
Secretary, State of Karnataka & Ors. V/s. Umadevi & Ors.
Ittyavira Mathai V/s. Varkey Varkey And Anr.
Vasudev Dhanjibhai Modi V/s. Rajabhai Abdul Rahman And Ors.
Balvant N. Viswamitra And Ors. V/s. Yadav Sadashiv Mule And Ors.
Nusli Neville Wadia V/s. Ivory Properties and Ors.
Fuerst Day Lawson Ltd. V/s. Jindal Exports Ltd.
Vijay Karia & Ors. V/s. Prysmian Cavi E Sistemi SRL & Ors
Avitel Post Studioz Ltd and Others V/s. HSBC PI Holdings (Mauritius) Ltd
Gemini Bay Transcription Pvt Ltd V/s. Integrated Sales Service Ltd
Shri Lal Mahal Ltd V/s. Progetto Grano Spa
NAFED (supra) and Asha John Divianathan V/s. Vikram Malhotra & Ors
Dropti Devi V/s. Union of India
LMJ International Limited V/s. Sleepwell Industries Co. Ltd.
Kandla Export Corporation & Anr. V/s. M/s. In Oci Corporation & Anr.
Gemini Bay Transcription Private Limited V/s. Integrated Sales Service Limited and Anr.
Cox and Kings Limited V/s. Sap India Private Limited and Anr.
The enforcement of foreign arbitral awards may only be refused on specific grounds as outlined in the Arbitration and Conciliation Act; violations of procedural norms do not themselves constitute a b....
Enforcement of a foreign arbitral award is granted under Section 48 of the Arbitration Act, emphasizing limited grounds for refusal based on public policy, requiring strong evidence of violation.
Point of law : Section 34 of English Arbitration Act deals with procedural and evidential matters.
The enforcement of foreign arbitral awards under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, is upheld unless specific procedural or public policy violations are proven, which was not established in ....
Point of Law : New York Convention recognizes that an award may not be enforced where it is predicated on a subject matter outside the jurisdiction of the arbitrator.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.