SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Bom) 955

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ALOK ARADHE, SANDEEP V.MARNE
Jan Mukti Morcha – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Sunip Sen, Senior Advocate with Ms. Rujuta Patil and Mr. Yohaan Shah i/b Negandhi Shah & Himayatullah, for Petitioner in PIL/40/2019.
Dr. Uday Warunjikar, for Petitioner in PIL(L)/81/2017.
For the Respondent:Mr. Darius J. Khambata, Senior Advocate with Mr. Joel Carlos i/b Mr. Yogesh Patil & Mr. Tushar Hathiramani, for Respondent No. 3 in PIL(L)/51/2017, PIL/40/2019, PIL(L)/81/2017 & for Respondent No. 7 in PIL/9/2019.
Smt. P.H. Kantharia, Govt. Pleader with Mrs. Jyoti Chavan, Addl. GP for State-Respondent No. 1 in PIL(L)/51/2017, PIL/9/2019.
Smt. Jyoti Chavan, Addl. GP for State, Respondent No. 1 in PIL(L)/81/2017.
Mr. Milind More, Addl. GP for State, Respondent No. 1 in PIL/40/2019
Mr. A.Y. Sakhare, Senior Advocate with Ms. Chaitalee Deochake i/b Ms. Komal R. Punjabi, for MCGM, Respondent No. 2 in PIL/40/2019 & PIL(L)/81/2017 and for Respondent No. 1 & 5 in PIL(L)/51/2017.
Mr. Vishal Kanade i/b Ms. Jaya Bagwe, for MCZMA, Respondent No. 4 in PIL/9/2019.
Mr. Santosh Daundkar, Petitioner-in-person in PIL/9/2019, present.

Table of Content
1. challenges regarding the establishment of the memorial. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. arguments against the memorial site selection. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
3. arguments against the site selection and process of trust formation. (Para 14)
4. court's view on policy decisions related to memorial establishment. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
5. discussion on legality of amendments to mmc act. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)
6. assessment of procedural adherence in decision-making. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31)
7. status and completion of the memorial project. (Para 32 , 33)
8. final dismissal of the petitions. (Para 34)

JUDGMENT :

Sandeep V. Marne, J.

1) These Petitions, filed in public interest, take exception to the decision of the State Government in setting up Balasaheb Thackeray Rashtriya Smarak (the Memorial) at the site of Mayor’s Bungalow located at Shivaji Park, Dadar, Mumbai. Though all the petitions oppose setting up of the Memorial at the site of Mayor’s Bungalow, different prayers are sought in each Petition. Broadly speaking however, the challenge in the Petitions relate to:-

(i) Government Resolution dated 27 September 2016 granting approval for setting up of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top