IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
M.S. SONAK, JITENDRA JAIN, JJ.
Mr D.V.M. Patel and Anr. – Petitioners
Versus
State of Maharashtra, through the Government Pleader and Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 2931 of 2018
Decided On : 10-07-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. trustees operating a heritage building sought legal protection. (Para 1) |
| 2. public trust status of the building. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. concerns about damage from metro construction. (Para 6 , 12 , 14 , 19) |
| 4. pre-construction concerns address impact on the heritage structure. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. vibrations from construction activities raise significant concerns. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 6. monitoring instruments and care requirements. (Para 22 , 23 , 34) |
| 7. expert committee intervention to ensure heritage safety. (Para 25 , 26 , 29) |
| 8. legal obligation to protect heritage structures. (Para 40 , 50 , 52) |
| 9. restoration obligations set for the fallen limestone finial. (Para 63 , 64 , 66) |
| 10. pmmrc's obligation to restore fallen structures. (Para 71 , 72) |
JUDGMENT :
(M.S. Sonak, J.)
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The Petitioners are the Trustees of the Jamsetjee Nesserwanjee Petit Institute, a public charitable trust registered under the provisions of the Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950 and a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860. The trust inter alia has founded and operates the J. N. Petit Reading Room and Library since 1856.
3. This petition concerns the building known as the “J. N. Petit Institute,” along with an arcade constructed on the land bearing C.S. No. 702 of Fort Division, in the Neo-Gothic Revival style, dated 1898. This structure features various ornamental, decorative, and distinctive elements, including a circular staircase tower, bouquets, finials, and tower turrets that shape its silhouette. The petitioners have stated that this building has an extremely shallow foundation, only around three metres deep, and extends beyond the superstructure of the building. It is acknowledged that this building is a Grade II A Heritage Structure and is regarded as one of the landmark properties along D.N. Road, Fort, Mumbai.
4. The Petitioners have pleaded that the said building was renovated in 2014-15 and was conferred the UNESCO Award of Distinction for Cultural Heritage Conservation in 2015.
5. The Petitioners have pleaded that the building has always been and is still used as a Reading Room and library, housing 1,00,000 books, including 2,400 rare books and 12 manuscripts, some of which date back to the 17th Century. The library also houses three collections of newspapers, viz. Jam-e-Jamshed from 1936 onwards, Times of India from 1933 onwards and Mumbai Samachar from 1926 onwards. The Petitioners have pleaded that the building is open to all subscribers to the Library/Reading Room, including the poor and needy citizens, at reasonable and affordable subscription rates. Several poor and needy students use the Library and Reading Room for their studies.
6. Metro Line III was proposed to be aligned along the D. N. Road, Fort. Several objections were raised from various quarters to this alignment, mainly because it would seriously affect the structures or stability of the several heritage structures on either side of this road. Even the Mumbai Heritage Conservation Committee (MHCC) objected to this alignment and withheld its No Objection Certificate (NOC) for some time. The MHCC, later, upon being assured that only the tunnelling method would be adopted and that no station, namely the Hutatma Chowk Station, would be constructed at D.N. Road, or that such a station would be built using the cut and cover method, reluctantly agreed to the Metro Line III alignment along D.N. Road.
7. Before the construction work could commence, the contractors engaged by the Mumbai Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. (MMRCL) sought the Petitioners’ NOC to allow them to enter the Petitioners’ property to carry out a pre-construction survey, to install building monitoring instruments and allow their representatives to read such monitoring instruments. The Petitioners were also requested to furnish structural/as-built drawings of the said building.
8. By letter dated 22 February 2017, the Petitioners sought som
Archaeological Survey of India Vs. Narender Anand and others
Rajeev Mankotia Vs. Secretary to the President of India and others
AI
The court emphasized the necessity of protecting heritage structures from developmental impacts while allowing the petitioners to seek further legal remedies concerning any damage post-construction.
The court's decision underscores the deference to expert opinions in matters concerning the preservation and demolition of heritage buildings, emphasizing the importance of safety considerations and ....
The court affirmed that expert assessments regarding the safety and structural integrity of heritage buildings are paramount in decisions about their preservation or demolition.
Actions would be taken to verify that the existing structure is in accordance with the existing Development Permission and only thereafter, Building Usage Permission would be granted.
The Court held that the TAC was not required to carry out non-destructive tests in the case of a load-bearing structure and that the TAC had considered all the relevant factors before classifying the....
The court ruled that the tomb in question does not qualify as an ancient monument under the Ancient Monuments Preservation Act, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive master plan for development.
Building owners have a constitutional obligation to ensure structural safety, and neglect renders them accountable for harm arising from collapses.
Doctrine of public trust was thus applied in the above context by the Supreme Court as it aimed at interfering with the course of the river and also affect the forest. In the present case, there is n....
Doctrine of Public Trust - Doctrine of public trust has been violated and breached by respondents in coming up with new academic block within precincts of Pratap Vilas Palace. - Palace is not a publi....
The court emphasized the importance of preserving the authenticity of historic buildings and the need for legal measures to ensure safety and stability.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.