Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
N.J.JAMADAR
Tukaram Moraba Jaunjal (since deceased), Dattatraya Tukaram Jaunjal (since deceased), through his LRs – Appellant
Versus
Mangala Balkrishna Patwardhan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the case involves non-user of premises leading to eviction. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding legal errors in applying non-user standards. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 3. court reinforces statutory requirements for eviction due to non-user. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. judgment highlights the sanctity of concurrent findings of fact. (Para 20 , 21) |
| 5. final dismissal of the petition consistent with lower court decisions. (Para 22 , 23) |
JUDGMENT :
N. J. JAMADAR, J.
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and, with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties, heard finally.
2. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assails the legality, propriety and correctness of a judgment and decree dated 30th June, 1998 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Sangli, in Regular Civil Appeal No.105 of 1989, whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioners – defendant Nos.1a to 1c against a decree of eviction passed by the Trial Court in RCS/401/1985 came to be dismissed by affirming the said decree.
3. The background facts can be stated in brief as under:
3.1 The respondents – plaintiffs are the owners of the shop premises. Tukaram Morba Jaundal, the original defendan
Non-user of rental premises for over six months without reasonable cause fulfills ground for eviction under Section 13(1)(k) of the Rent Act, 1947.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the findings of fact based on the appreciation of evidence are within the province of the trial court and first appellate court, and re-apprec....
Point of Law : Jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has to be very narrowly construed in the context of provisions of the DRC Act, especially when there are two c....
The plaintiff in a tenancy dispute must prove non-use of the property for over six months to recover possession; the defendants failed to meet this burden, affirming the plaintiff's claims.
Modification of tenancy use from commercial to industrial without consent constitutes misuse as per applicable rent control legislation, warranting eviction.
High Court under Article 227 set aside appellate reversal of rent control eviction order, holding it perverse for reappreciating evidence on landlord's bona fide ground floor shop need post-retiremen....
The court affirmed that non-compliance with statutory rent payment obligations and unauthorized changes in property use justify eviction under the Rent Act.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the creation of a sub-tenancy depends on the specific facts of each case and cannot be presumed solely based on a family member assisting i....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
