IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
R.G. AVACHAT, NEERAJ P. DHOTE, JJ.
Raman Ramsingh Pawar - Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra, Through its Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department - Respondent
Writ Petition No.8260 of 2022
Decided on : 16-07-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties involved in the writ petition. (Para 1) |
| 2. constitution of panchayats under article 226. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. petitioner argues against the bifurcation of panchayat. (Para 4) |
| 4. state justifies notification based on law compliance. (Para 5) |
| 5. population determines naming of new panchayat. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 6. governor's power in executing panchayat formation. (Para 14) |
| 7. writ petition dismissed. (Para 15) |
ORDER :
NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.
1. Heard finally at the stage of admission with consent of both the sides.
2. By this Writ Petition invoking jurisdiction under article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioners, who are the residents of Village Burudkhe, Taluka Sakri, District Dhule, have raised the challenge to the Notification dated 17th June, 2022, issued by Respondent No.1 – State Government, constituting the two (2) Panchayats by name Panchmauli and Pinjarzadi.
3. The admitted factual aspects giving rise to the present Writ Petition are as follows :
(I) The Burudkhe Panchayat was constituted on 31st March, 1959, comprising the Revenue Villages - Burudkhe, Pinjarzadi, Sabarsonda, and Panchmauli, in Sakri Taluka of District Dhule. Subsequently, Village Burudkhe was included in Scheduled Area vide Notifcation dated 2nd December, 1985, issued by the Ministry of Law and Justice (Legislative Department), New Delhi, under the Scheduled Areas (Maharashtra) Order, 1985. In 2020, the residents of Village Pinjarzadi submitted an Application to Respondent No.4 – Block Development Ofcer, Panchayat Samiti, Sakri to constitute a separate Panchayat for Village Pinjarzadi by excluding it from Burudkhe Panchayat. Pursuant to the said request, the subject was considered in a meeting of Gram Sabha of Burudkhe Panchayat dated 23rd February, 2020, and it was resolved that, Villages Pinjarzadi and Sabarsonda be excluded from Burudkhe Panchayat for constituting Pinjarzadi Panchayat. The resolution of the Gram Sabha was forwarded to the Respondent No.3 – Chief Executive Ofcer, Zilla Parishad, Dhule for necessary action. The Standing Committee of Dhule Zilla Parishad, in its meeting dated 1st November, 2021, approved the resolution of Panchayat Burudkhe for excluding Pinjarzadi from Burudkhe Panchayat and for constituting the separate Panchayat for Pinjarzadi. The Respondent No.3 – Chief Executive Ofcer, Zilla Parishad, Dhule forwarded the proposal to the Divisional Commissioner, Nashik Division, Nashik, on 1st December, 2021, who forwarded the same to Respondent No.1 – State Government. Considering the proposal, impugned Notifcation came to be issued, by which, Burudkhe Panchayat was bifurcated, and two (2) separate Panchayats, namely, Pinjarzadi and Panchmauli came to be constituted. Thereafter, the State Election Commission declared the Elections of various Gram Panchayats. The Elections to the said two (2) Village Panchayats were conducted.
4. It is submitted by the learned Advocate for the Petitioners that, the resolution of Gram Sabha was to exclude the Villages Pinjarzadi and Sabarsonda from Burudkhe Panchayat for constituting the separate Panchayat for Pinjarzadi. However, Respondent No.1 – State constituted two (2) Panchayats by name Pinjarzadi and Panchmauli, and included the Village Burudkhe in the Panchmauli Panchayat, which was contrary to the resolution. The existence of Burudkhe Panchayat, which was in existence since March 1959, was brought to an end. As Burudkhe was declared as the Scheduled Area, it is only with the assent of the President, it could be removed from the Scheduled Area. The Villagers of Village Burudkhe made a representation for making corrections in the Notifcation to restore its earlier identity. The impugned Notifcation be set aside and consequently, the Elections conducted after constitution of the above-referred two (2) Gram Panchayats also be set aside.
5. It is submitted by the learned Assistant Government Pleader that, the impugned Notifcation was issued in consonance with the provisions of law.
Ganpatrao Bhosale and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others
State of U. P. and Others Vs. Pradhan Sangh Kshettra Samiti and Others
The Notification bifurcating Panchayats complied with legal requirements, affirming that restructuring aligns with constitutional mandates without necessitating Presidential assent as per the relevan....
State Government would thereafter consider the recommendation, and, in its discretion make a decision under Section 7(2) of the Act.
Section 7 of Act, 1993 is only with regard to effective consultation with Gram Panchayat. Meaning thereby that if Gram Panchayat is not agreeable with merger then it is for State Government to decide....
Exclusion of local area from a municipal area.- (1) Any inhabitant of a municipal area or local area in respect of which a notification has been published under section 6 may, if he objects to the ex....
Conversion of Gram Panchayat to Nagar Panchayat is a legislative function, not requiring consent from the Gram Panchayat, provided statutory processes are followed, ensuring public welfare is priorit....
The legitimacy of administrative classifications must be challenged timely; clerical errors do not invalidate established orders regarding Scheduled Areas.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.