SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Bom) 1043

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
R.G. AVACHAT, NEERAJ P. DHOTE, JJ.
Raman Ramsingh Pawar - Appellant 
Versus
The State of Maharashtra, Through its Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department - Respondent 
Writ Petition No.8260 of 2022
Decided on : 16-07-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. D. S. Bagul, Advocate . P. K. Lakhotiya, Adv
For the Respondent:Mr. N. N. Desale, Mr. Lalit S. Mahajan, Advocate, Mr. A. V. Patil, Advocate for Respondent No.6.

The Notification bifurcating Panchayats complied with legal requirements, affirming that restructuring aligns with constitutional mandates without necessitating Presidential assent as per the relevant Acts.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Panchayati Raj - The challenge was made against the Notification dated 17th June, 2022, constituting two separate Panchayats, Pinjarzadi and Panchmauli, excluding Burudkhe Village contrary to the Gram Sabha resolution - Petitioners contended the essence of the Notification violated the principles of local governance established under the Act of 1959. (Paras 2-5)

(B) Panchayati Raj Act, 1959 - Section 4 - While the Burudkhe Panchayat existed since 1959, the separation was executed following a proposal backed by the Gram Sabha, supported by population considerations mandated by Section 4 - Dismissal of claims to retain Burudkhe as a Panchayat are justified as law mandates naming based on population metrics. (Paras 10-12)

(C) Scheduled Areas (Maharashtra) Order, 1985 - The court clarified that the abrogation of the Scheduled Area status of Burudkhe was not required in executing the notification to bifurcate the Panchayat, as this impugned notification did not negate Burudkhe's status as a scheduled area. (Paras 13-14)

Findings of Court:
The impugned Notification adhered to the law and was executed through proper authority, affirming the rationale for the separation of Panchayats.

Issues: The legality of the Notification’s issuance and its adherence to established procedures under the Act and Constitution.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Notification complied with legal provisions as the constitutional mandate allows for restructuring of Panchayati Raj institutions provided the process is followed correctly without the necessity of Presidential assent under the given circumstances.

Result: The Writ Petition is dismissed.

Table of Content
1. parties involved in the writ petition. (Para 1)
2. constitution of panchayats under article 226. (Para 2 , 3)
3. petitioner argues against the bifurcation of panchayat. (Para 4)
4. state justifies notification based on law compliance. (Para 5)
5. population determines naming of new panchayat. (Para 12 , 13)
6. governor's power in executing panchayat formation. (Para 14)
7. writ petition dismissed. (Para 15)

ORDER :

NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.

1. Heard finally at the stage of admission with consent of both the sides.

2. By this Writ Petition invoking jurisdiction under article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioners, who are the residents of Village Burudkhe, Taluka Sakri, District Dhule, have raised the challenge to the Notification dated 17th June, 2022, issued by Respondent No.1 – State Government, constituting the two (2) Panchayats by name Panchmauli and Pinjarzadi.

3. The admitted factual aspects giving rise to the present Writ Petition are as follows :

(I) The Burudkhe Panchayat was constituted on 31st March, 1959, comprising the Revenue Villages - Burudkhe, Pinjarzadi, Sabarsonda, and Panchmauli, in Sakri Taluka of District Dhule. Subsequently, Village Burudkhe was included in Scheduled Area vide Notifcation dated 2nd December, 1985, issued by the Ministry of Law and Justice (Legislative Department), New Delhi, under the Scheduled Areas (Maharashtra) Order, 1985. In 2020, the residents of Village Pinjarzadi submitted an Application to Respondent No.4 – Block Development Ofcer, Panchayat Samiti, Sakri to constitute a separate Panchayat for Village Pinjarzadi by excluding it from Burudkhe Panchayat. Pursuant to the said request, the subject was considered in a meeting of Gram Sabha of Burudkhe Panchayat dated 23rd February, 2020, and it was resolved that, Villages Pinjarzadi and Sabarsonda be excluded from Burudkhe Panchayat for constituting Pinjarzadi Panchayat. The resolution of the Gram Sabha was forwarded to the Respondent No.3 – Chief Executive Ofcer, Zilla Parishad, Dhule for necessary action. The Standing Committee of Dhule Zilla Parishad, in its meeting dated 1st November, 2021, approved the resolution of Panchayat Burudkhe for excluding Pinjarzadi from Burudkhe Panchayat and for constituting the separate Panchayat for Pinjarzadi. The Respondent No.3 – Chief Executive Ofcer, Zilla Parishad, Dhule forwarded the proposal to the Divisional Commissioner, Nashik Division, Nashik, on 1st December, 2021, who forwarded the same to Respondent No.1 – State Government. Considering the proposal, impugned Notifcation came to be issued, by which, Burudkhe Panchayat was bifurcated, and two (2) separate Panchayats, namely, Pinjarzadi and Panchmauli came to be constituted. Thereafter, the State Election Commission declared the Elections of various Gram Panchayats. The Elections to the said two (2) Village Panchayats were conducted.

4. It is submitted by the learned Advocate for the Petitioners that, the resolution of Gram Sabha was to exclude the Villages Pinjarzadi and Sabarsonda from Burudkhe Panchayat for constituting the separate Panchayat for Pinjarzadi. However, Respondent No.1 – State constituted two (2) Panchayats by name Pinjarzadi and Panchmauli, and included the Village Burudkhe in the Panchmauli Panchayat, which was contrary to the resolution. The existence of Burudkhe Panchayat, which was in existence since March 1959, was brought to an end. As Burudkhe was declared as the Scheduled Area, it is only with the assent of the President, it could be removed from the Scheduled Area. The Villagers of Village Burudkhe made a representation for making corrections in the Notifcation to restore its earlier identity. The impugned Notifcation be set aside and consequently, the Elections conducted after constitution of the above-referred two (2) Gram Panchayats also be set aside.

5. It is submitted by the learned Assistant Government Pleader that, the impugned Notifcation was issued in consonance with the provisions of law.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top