IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
M.S. JAWALKAR, PRAVIN S. PATIL
Gram Panchayat, Yerkheda, Tah. Kamptee, District-Nagpur, through its Sarpanch Smt. Saritabai Madhukar Rangari – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra, trough its Secretary, Rural Development Department – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Pravin S. Patil, J.
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of the learned Counsel for the parties, the matter is taken up for final disposal.
2. By this petition, initially the petitioners seek declaration that there is no need of conversion of Gram Panchayat Yerkheda into Nagar Panchayat. However, during the pendency of the petition, in view of subsequent development, the present petitioners challenged the Government Resolution, dated 04.10.2024 and further seek direction to quash and set aside the final Notification dated 11.02.2025 and consequent order of appointment of Administrator dated 11.02.2025 issued by respondent no.1-Rural Development Department, State of Maharashtra.
3. The brief facts giving rise to the present petition are as under :
The petitioners are the Gram Panchayat Members who hold the post in view of Gram Panchayat Election held in the month of November, 2022. The present petitioner no.1 stated that after the period of 25 years, the scheduled caste candidate was given chance to head the Gram Panchayat and accordingly she is the first lady belonging to scheduled caste category who was elected for the post of Sarpanch. It is further stated th
State of Madhya Pradesh and others .vs. Sanjay Nagayach and others
Baldev Singh and others .vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others
Dr. Subramanian Swamy .vs. Dr. Manmohan Singh and another
Union of India and others vs. V.R. Nanukuttan Nair
Nasiruddin and others vs. Sita Ram Agarwal
Sundarjas Kanyalal Bhatija and others vs. Collector, Thane, Maharashtra and others
Conversion of Gram Panchayat to Nagar Panchayat is a legislative function, not requiring consent from the Gram Panchayat, provided statutory processes are followed, ensuring public welfare is priorit....
Section 7 of Act, 1993 is only with regard to effective consultation with Gram Panchayat. Meaning thereby that if Gram Panchayat is not agreeable with merger then it is for State Government to decide....
The notifications for municipal formation and alteration complied with constitutional mandates and statutory requirements, and the principles of natural justice were not violated.
Point of law: Duration of Municipalities - Every municipality is entitled to continue for a period of 5 years from date appointed for its first meeting and no longer.
Gram panchayat - Recommendation of specification of village - Petitioner gram panchayats are not entitled to an opportunity of hearing, it cannot be said that no effective consultation was made by re....
If two views are possible, the view taken by the competent authority/Executive will not be upset on the ground that the Court thinks that the other (better) view ought to have been taken.
The court emphasized the discretion of the State Government to declare its intention to specify an area as a larger urban area, medium urban area, or transitional area, and the mandatory nature of th....
Exclusion of local area from a municipal area.- (1) Any inhabitant of a municipal area or local area in respect of which a notification has been published under section 6 may, if he objects to the ex....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.