Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
G.S.KULKARNI
Municipal Staff Om Satlaj Co-op Hsg Sty Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra, through Urban Development Department – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
G. S. KULKARNI, J.
1 This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is being pressed only for the following prayer:
“C. issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, direction directing the said Respondent Nos. 1-3 not to insist on a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the Respondent No. 5 and / or the Respondent No. 6, their subordinates, consultants or any other person claiming through them, as a condition prerequisite to processing any application for development, permission or NOC that the Petitioner may make either through themselves or through the Respondent No. 4, in furtherance of the Development Agreement dated 15th March, 2024.”
2 The Petitioner is a Co-operative Housing Society formed by the Municipal Staff and is the owner of land alongwith the building stated to be situated at Irla – Village, Vile Parle (West) Mumbai-400056. The existing building consisted of Ground + 3 upper floor, having 13 residential flats. The Building was in a dilapidated condition. Accordingly, in a Special General Body Meeting held on 31st January 2010, a resolution was passed by the petitioner to reconstruct / redevelop
The court ruled that a redevelopment project cannot be stalled due to the lack of a No Objection Certificate from a defaulting previous developer, provided that the termination of the earlier Develop....
Termination of a development agreement is valid where a corporate debtor persistently defaults, and such rights do not qualify as assets under the moratorium rule of the IBC.
The authority under Sec. 95A needs to ensure collective decision-making, permissions, and adequate transit accommodation for redevelopment. Circulars issued under Sec. 79A are recommendatory, and mat....
The court upheld the validity of the redevelopment process under Section 41A of the Gujarat Ownership Flats Act, 1973, and directed the respondents to vacate their flats and hand over peaceful and va....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the obligation of parties to comply with court directions and the serious consequences for non-compliance.
The court established that failure of a developer to meet obligations under a development agreement negates any claims to redevelopment rights during insolvency proceedings.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
