Back
J. B. PARDIWALA, R. MAHADEVAN
A A Estates Private Limited Through Its Resolution Professional Harshad Shamkant Deshpande – Appellant
Versus
Kher Nagar Sukhsadan Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. civil appeal details and prior judgments. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. background of development agreements and related disputes. (Para 6) |
| 3. appellant's arguments against the high court's judgment. (Para 7) |
| 4. respondent's defenses and prior failures of the appellant. (Para 8) |
| 5. respondent no. 8's position and progress in redevelopment. (Para 9) |
| 6. court's factual determinations regarding ownership and possession. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 7. legal issues identified for adjudication. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 8. court's analysis on the validity of agreements and rights. (Para 16) |
| 9. conclusion on the validity of terminations and implications for the insolvency process. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 10. final verdict and direction concerning compliance. (Para 23 , 24 , 25) |
JUDGMENT
Leave granted.
3. Appellant No. 1 is the Corporate Debtor, which is presently undergoing Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process2 [For short, “CIRP”] under the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 20163 [For short, “IBC”]. Appellant No. 2, Mr. Harshad Shamkant Deshpande is the Resolution Professional appointed in respect of Appellant No. 1 in the said proceedings. Before the High Court, they were arrayed
Termination of a development agreement is valid where a corporate debtor persistently defaults, and such rights do not qualify as assets under the moratorium rule of the IBC.
Amendments to pleadings are permissible if they do not fundamentally change the nature of the suit and are necessary for determining the real questions in controversy.
The court upheld the validity of the redevelopment process under Section 41A of the Gujarat Ownership Flats Act, 1973, and directed the respondents to vacate their flats and hand over peaceful and va....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the Court's exercise of plenary jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution of India to give quietus to the pending disputes and provide dir....
The court established that failure of a developer to meet obligations under a development agreement negates any claims to redevelopment rights during insolvency proceedings.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
