IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.
Harshad Suresh Sonawane - Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra - Respondent
Criminal Application (Apl) No. 1479 of 2024
Decided on : 17-07-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background facts of the domestic violence case (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments regarding the validity of marriage and maintenance (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. court's observations on marriage validity and domestic relationship (Para 15 , 17) |
| 4. ratio decidendi regarding presumed validity of marriage (Para 18 , 19) |
| 5. conclusion to dismiss the application (Para 20 , 21) |
JUDGMENT :
MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.
1. This Criminal Application has been filed by the Applicant assailing the conditional order dated 30th September 2024 passed on Exhibit – 4, i.e. Stay Application filed in PWDVA Appeal No. 15 of 2024, by directing the Applicant to deposit Rs.5,00,000/- as a precondition for stay. Respondent No. 2 has filed Domestic Violence Complaint bearing No. DV/57/2020 before the 10th J.M.F.C., CBD Belapur, Navi Mumbai under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (for short “the D.V. Act, 2005”). The J.M.F.C. at Belapur has passed the order dated 20th April 2024 on an Interim Application filed by Respondent No. 2 directing the present Applicant to pay monthly maintenance of Rs.20,000/- alongwith monthly rent of Rs.10,000/- towards the residence order to Respondent No. 2 till the decision of the main application.
2. It is the case of the Applicant that after having seen the profile of the Applicant on Matrimonial Site and also from Facebook profile Respondent No. 2 has met him, and after that they have decided to marry. Accordingly, their marriage was performed on 30th September 2017 at Trambakeshwar, Nashik in presence of the presence of parents of Respondent No. 2. After marriage, Respondent No. 2 has started making unreasonable demands with the Applicant. She has treated him with immense mental cruelty and has tormented him. Initially, after marriage they had shifted to Dhule, however, on the insistence of Respondent No. 2, he was required to shift back to Airoli.
3. Time and again, Respondent No. 2 has made demands of huge amounts of monies from him. According to him, Respondent No. 2 has demanded Rs.2 crores and her parents have demanded Rs.10 lakhs from the Applicant. The Applicant has transferred an amount of Rs.5 lakhs from his bank account to Respondent No. 2. For the entire year 2018-19, he was pressurized to give all his income to Respondent No.2 and her parents.
4. On 25th July 2018, Respondent No.2 has suddenly asked the Applicant to get their marriage registered, which he immediately approved off. However, when he received the marriage certificate he was shocked to see the date of marriage in the certificate which was recorded as 25th July 2018, instead of 30th September 2017. When he questioned Respondent No. 2 about it, she was evasive. According to him, once she had also come late night after consuming alcohol in the May 2018. He has narrated various incidents of his torture. According to him, because of constant mental harassment and fear for registering false case by Respondent No. 2, he was constrained to leave the house. Respondent No. 2 has registered an FIR vide C.R. No. 36 of 2020, alleging the offence punishable under Section 498A of the IPC, 1860, against the present Applicant at Rabale Police Station, Navi Mumbai on 22nd January 2020. The Applicant filed Anticipatory Bail Application which came to be allowed by the Sessions Judge, Thane. Thereafter, Respondent No.2 filed Domestic Violence Complaint bearing No. DV/57/2020 against the Applicant on 3rd March 2020. The Interim Application (Exhibit-5) came to be partly allowed by the J.M.F.C, 10th Court at Belapur vide order dated 20th April 2024. Being aggrieved with the order dated 20th April 2024, the Applicant has filed Appeal before the Additional Sessions Court at Belapur, Navi Mumbai, being PWDVA Appeal No. 15 of 2024.
5. During the pendency of the Appeal, Respondent No. 2 had filed an application for issuing distress warrant before the J.M.F.C., Belapur, which was allowed vide order dated 17th Aug
A marriage can only be declared void by a competent court; until then, maintenance obligations remain under the D.V. Act, affirming the necessity of legal recognition of marital status.
The Domestic Violence Act permits an aggrieved person to seek maintenance even after the dissolution of marriage, provided there is evidence of domestic violence, and the definitions of 'aggrieved pe....
The court upheld the broader definition of 'domestic relationship' in the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, allowing maintenance claims from individuals in non-legally recognized marria....
There is no bar to seek maintenance under different statutes, and the amount awarded should not overlap and should be inclusive of maintenance under each jurisdiction and not exclusive.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement to relief under the PWDV Act based on the finding of a domestic relationship, and the permissibility of adjustment of maintenance a....
A divorced Muslim woman is entitled to maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C., regardless of her marital status, emphasizing the husband's obligation to provide for his wife and children.
A woman in a live-in relationship is entitled to maintenance under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, provided the relationship meets the definition of domestic relationship.
Maintenance and compensation – Female Live-in-Partner can be granted relief under provisions of Domestic Violence Act, 2005.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.