Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
N.J.JAMADAR
Mahadev Krishna Tambe (deleted as dead) – Appellant
Versus
Union of India represented by General Manger – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. circumstances surrounding the death of amit tambe (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. legal standing of smt. sonal to pursue the appeal (Para 6 , 13 , 27) |
| 3. arguments presented by the parties in the appeal (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. interpretation of 'untoward incident' under the railways act (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. establishing the evidence of the deceased being a bona fide passenger (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 25 , 26) |
| 6. survivability of claims under the railways act following the death of a claimant (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 7. final decision in favor of the appellants (Para 54 , 55 , 56) |
JUDGMENT:-
N. J. JAMADAR, J.
1. This appeal under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 (“the Act, 1987”) is directed against the judgment and award dated 16th June, 2014 passed by the learned Member (Technical) of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, Mumbai (“the Tribunal”), whereby the claim application OA No.(IIU)/MCC/2011/0891, preferred by the appellants under Section 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989 (“the Railways Act”) for compensation on account of the death of Amit Tambe (“the deceased”), the son of applicant No.1 Mahadev and brother of a
The liability of the railway administration to compensate for untoward incidents is strict and can be claimed by the legal representatives of a deceased dependent even after their demise.
The claimant must only prove the occurrence of an untoward incident; the absence of a ticket does not preclude compensation if circumstances suggest travel.
The absence of a valid ticket does not negate the presumption of a passenger's bona fide status, and the Railway Administration is strictly liable for untoward incidents.
The Railway Administration is strictly liable to compensate for the death of a bona fide passenger resulting from an untoward incident, irrespective of negligence, provided the incident falls within ....
The court established that a claimant must demonstrate foundational facts for compensation under the Railways Act; non-recovery of a ticket does not negate passenger status, and the railway's liabili....
The absence of a ticket does not negate the presumption of a passenger's status, and the Railway is liable for compensation under section 124-A for untoward incidents.
The Railway Administration is strictly liable for compensation when a verified bona fide passenger dies in an untoward incident, barring specific statutory exceptions; evidence of bona fide passenger....
The court established that the absence of a ticket does not disqualify a deceased from being considered a bona fide passenger under the Railways Act.
The court established that a bona fide passenger's negligence does not preclude entitlement to compensation for an untoward incident under the Indian Railways Act.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
