SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Bom) 1276

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
Amit Chandole - Appellant
Vs.
Directorate of Enforcement Through its Assistant Director, Mumbai & Anr. - Respondent
Writ Petition No.6332 Of 2024 With Interim Application (ST) No.12908 Of 2023 IN Writ Petition No.6332 Of 2024 With Writ Petition No.4523 Of 2022 With Interim Application No.1432 Of 2023 In Writ Petition No.4523 Of 2022
Decided On : 11-06-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Aabad Ponda, Senior Advocate a/w Sebin Michael Joseph, Sandra Jaison & Mayank Jain
For the Respondent:Mr. H. S. Venegavkar, SPP a/w Kamar Ali Shaikh & Leepika Rasiwasia, Mr. Amit Desai, Senior Advocate a/w Kushal Mor, Gopal Krishna Iyyer, Mamta Harwani & Riddhi Dhamecha i/b Dhiren H. Shah, Ms. P. P. Bhosale, APP, for the Respondent-State. Mr. Dharmesh Joshi a/w Imran Khan, for the Intervenor.

A Magistrate must duly consider all aspects before accepting a 'C' Summary Report, ensuring the informant's opportunity to be heard.

Headnote:The Court analyzed the provisions of the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002, particularly Section 44, regarding the committal of scheduled offences to special courts. The facts involve allegations of financial misconduct related to the deployment of guards by a company, with significant cash transactions. The Court found that the lower court's acceptance of a 'C' Summary Report lacked adequate analysis, leading to remand for reconsideration. The key issues addressed included the mandatory duties of the Magistrate when presented with 'C' Summary Reports, drawing from precedents like Bhagwant Singh v. Commr. of Police and Rana Ayyub v. Directorate of Enforcement. The petitions were allowed, resulting in the lower court's orders being set aside and instructions for fresh considerations.

Table of Content
1. summary of facts related to the allegations against the parties. (Para 1 , 2 , 5)
2. discussions on the judges' observations and implications for future actions. (Para 3 , 11 , 12)
3. court's analysis of the procedural missteps of lower courts. (Para 6 , 10 , 13)
4. emphasis on the legal duties of the magistrate regarding reports. (Para 7 , 14)
5. final decision to allow the writ petitions with remand instructions. (Para 16)

JUDGMENT :

MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.

1. The reliefs sought in Criminal Writ Petition No.4523 of 2022 are as follows :-

“b. That this Hon’ble Court be pleased to quash and set aside letters dated 7th September, 2022 (Exh. 43), 15th September, 2022 (Exh. 48) in Special Case No. 1124 of 2020, pending on the file of Ld. Special PMLA Judge. Mumbai;

c. That this Hon’ble Court be pleased to quash and set aside letter bearing OW No. 17951/2022 dated 4th August, 2022 from the Registrar of Sessions Court, Mumbai, directing the Ld. Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrates 47th Court at Esplanade, Mumbai, to pass appropriate orders with regards to the ‘C’-Summary Report, and thereafter commit the same to the Ld. Special PMLA Court, Mumbai;

d. That this Hon’ble Court be pleased to quash and set aside the judgement and order dated 14/09/2022 passed by the Ld. Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrates 47th Court at Esplanade, Mumbai thereby sending the records of CC No. 2448/MISC/2021 in MECR No. 5/2020 back to the Ld. Special PMLA Court, Mumbai;

e. That this Hon’ble Court be pleased to quash and set aside the impugned judgement and order dated 14/09/2022, accepting ‘C’-Summary Report, passed by the Ld. Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrates 47th Court at Esplanade, Mumbai in CC No. 2448/MISC/2021 in MECR No. 5/2020;”

2. The following relief is sought in Writ Petition No.6332 of 2024 :-

“A. Issue a writ of Certiorari or any other writ, order or direction setting aside the impugned Order dated 18/07/2022 passed by the Ld. Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 47th Court, Esplanade, Mumbai in C.C No. 2448/Misc/2021 and all the proceedings initiated consequent thereof;”

3. The impugned Order dated 18th July 2022 has been passed by the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 47th Court, Esplanade, Mumbai in C.C. No.2448/MISC/2021 below application filed by Prosecution For Directorate Of Enforcement for committal of the said proceedings before the PMLA Special Court at Mumbai. The prayer sought in the said Application reads as under :-

“a) this Hon’ble Court be pleased to commit the abovesaid case of scheduled offences under IPC at C-Summary MISC/4702448/2021 filed in FIR No. 05/2020 filed by EOW for a simultaneous trial with PMLA Case No: 1124/2020 to the Designated PMLA Court Mumbai (court no.16) in view of the provisions of Section 43(2) read with Section 44(1)(c) of the PMLA, 2002.”

4. The learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate by said impugned Order dated 18th July 2022 committed the said case to the PMLA Special Court. The said Order is challenged in Criminal Writ Petition No.6332 of 2024.

5. Before considering the challenge raised in both the Writ Petitions, it is necessary to set out brief facts of the case as set out in Writ Petition No.4523 of 2022 :-

i. That the Complainant, Shri Ramesh lyer, Ex-Vice Chairman of Topsgrup Services Ltd., alleged that he learnt that there are various off the record transactions being carried out from the Company.

ii. That amongst other allegations, it was alleged that in the year 2014, a contract was signed by M/s Topsgrup Services & Solutions Ltd, with Mumbai Metropolitan Regional Development Authority (MMRDA) as per which about 350 to 500 guards were to be deployed at MMRDA sites on a monthly basis. It is submitted that out of the same, only 70% of guards were actually deployed; however, the billing was done for all the guards (100% deployment) as per contract, and the wages-paid details were submitted to MMRDA for 100% of the contract value based on the numbe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top