Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
N.J.JAMADAR
Anwar Liyakat Khan – Appellant
Versus
Ramesh Dattatraya Dhone – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. consent decrees must be legally sound and free from fraud if upheld. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. fraud undermines the integrity of consent decrees, allowing for recall even by third parties. (Para 10 , 12 , 18) |
| 3. legal procedures allow challenges to consent decrees when fraud is alleged, focusing on proper court jurisdiction. (Para 22 , 26 , 30) |
JUDGMENT :
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and, with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties, heard finally.
3. The background facts necessary for the determination of this petition can be stated in brief as under:
3.1 Dara K. Irani was the holder of several properties described in Exhibit-A appended to RCS/2546/2022. Dara Irani passed away on 21st October, 2004. During his lifetime, in the year 2004, Dara Irani had executed a Deed of Assignment in favour of Anwar Khan, the defendant in RCS/2546/2022 (petitioner No.1 herein) and thereby agreed to sale, convey and alienate all his properties. Dara Iranai had allegedly received an amount of Rs.51,00,000/- from the defendant towards the part consideration. Dara Irani had executed a Power of Attorney in favour of Mr. Arvindkumar C. Rao, the plaintiff in RCS/2546/2022 (petit
A consent decree obtained through fraud is challengeable by a third party, and such a challenge does not require an independent suit.
An appeal against a consent decree is barred under Section 96(3) of the CPC; aggrieved parties must contest the decree's validity in the same court that issued it.
An independent suit challenging a consent decree is barred under Order XXIII Rule 3A of the C.P.C. if the allegations of fraud are predominantly about breach/non-compliance of the consent terms/conse....
A consent decree obtained by fraud must be challenged in the court that issued it; separate suits for challenge are not maintainable.
A party aggrieved by a compromise decree has a right to challenge the compromise decree by way of an appeal or to approach the same court which passed such decree by way of an appropriate application....
(1) No suit shall lie to set aside a decree on the ground that compromise on which decree is based was not lawful.(2) Mere clever drafting would not permit plaintiff to make suit maintainable which o....
A party not involved in a compromise decree may challenge it if they do not claim rights through a party to that decree, as per Order 23 Rule 3-A.
A consent decree obtained through fraud is void, and courts must investigate claims of fraud before accepting the decree as valid.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
