IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
G.S.KULKARNI, ADVAIT M.SETHNA
Ashapura Minechem Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Indian Bureau of Mines through Ministry of Mines – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.
Any State Largess is rooted in the foundation of “trusteeship, which is premised on need and not on the individual greed.[The quoted, italicized portion are the “telling words” of the Father of the Nation – Mahatma Gandhi.]
1. This is a Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the following reliefs which reads thus.
“(a) That this Hon’ble Court be pleased to declare that Section 4 -A(4) of the Mines & Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 as amended with effect from 28.3.2021 does not apply to leases executed prior thereto and that such lease shall be governed by the provisions of Section 4 -A(4) of the Mines & Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 as they stood on the date of execution of such leases;
(b) To declare that the retrospective application of the provision under Sec. 4-A as amended by the said Amendment of 2021 is violative of the fundamental rights of the Petitioner under Articles 14, 19(1) (g) and 21 as guaranteed under Part III of the Indian Constitution.
(c) That in the alternative to prayer (a) above, this Hon’ble Court be pleased to hold that in computing the period of two years
Common Cause Vs. Union of India
Deepak Kumar & Ors. Vs. State of Haryana & Ors.
Monnet Ispat and Energy Ltd. Vs. Union of India
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.