Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
ROHIT W.JOSHI
Sayyaji S/o Kishan – Appellant
Versus
Shrikishan S/o Laxminarayan Mandhane – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff claims ownership through adverse possession. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. appellate court's decisions on dismissal are justified. (Para 4 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. possession must be explained; findings on physical possession are crucial. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. final ruling based on substantial evidence supports dismissal. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
JUDGMENT :
ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.
1. The appellants in the present second appeal are legal representatives of original plaintiff. The plaintiff had filed suit, being Regular Civil Suit No.134 of 1979 for declaration that he had become owner of suit property, being land bearing survey no.208 admeasuring 1.19 HR situated at village Ratnali, Tq. Biloli, Dist. Nanded by way of adverse possession and for injunction restraining the defendants from disturbing his possession over the suit property.
2. It is case of the plaintiff that somewhere around the year 1958 and 1959, he had advanced a loan of Rs.10,000/- to defendant no.3. The plaintiff claimed that defendant nos.2 and 3 were partners and loan was obtained by defendant no.3 for both the partners. The plaintiff claimed that the loan was to be repaid within period of six months and because the loan
The claim of adverse possession requires proving actual, continuous, and exclusive possession, particularly regarding land with structures.
Adverse possession requires a clear claim of ownership and knowledge of the true owner's rights; mere possession is insufficient.
To establish adverse possession, the claimant must specifically plead and prove a hostile assertion of ownership, disclaiming the original title from a particular date, which was not accomplished her....
The judgment emphasizes the legal principles of adverse possession, including the requirements of open, clear, continuous, and hostile possession, burden of proof, and the need for a substantial ques....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that convincing evidence is required to establish settled possession through adverse possession, and mere inferential circumstances are not suffici....
Continuous possession must be proven to obtain an injunction; mere revenue entries are not conclusive if rebutted by evidence.
Claim of adverse possession requires open, continuous possession with knowledge to the rightful owner. Plaintiffs failed to provide sufficient evidence, resulting in dismissal.
The burden of proof is on the plaintiff in a suit for declaration and possession. Timely action is required in seeking mandatory injunction. Failure to establish title and adverse possession by the d....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
