Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
ROHIT W.JOSHI
Sayyaji S/o Kishan – Appellant
Versus
Shrikishan S/o Laxminarayan Mandhane – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff claims ownership through adverse possession. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. appellate court's decisions on dismissal are justified. (Para 4 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. possession must be explained; findings on physical possession are crucial. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. final ruling based on substantial evidence supports dismissal. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
JUDGMENT :
1. The appellants in the present second appeal are legal representatives of original plaintiff. The plaintiff had filed suit, being Regular Civil Suit No.134 of 1979 for declaration that he had become owner of suit property, being land bearing survey no.208 admeasuring 1.19 HR situated at village Ratnali, Tq. Biloli, Dist. Nanded by way of adverse possession and for injunction restraining the defendants from disturbing his possession over the suit property.
3. The learned Trial Court framed issues in the matter and on recording evidence was pleased to dismiss the suit on 05.01.1985. The learned Trial Court has held that the plaintiff had failed to prove his case of adverse possession, however, the learned Trial Court has recorded findings with respect to possession over some portion of the suit property in favour of the plaintiff
The claim of adverse possession requires proving actual, continuous, and exclusive possession, particularly regarding land with structures.
Adverse possession requires a clear claim of ownership and knowledge of the true owner's rights; mere possession is insufficient.
To establish adverse possession, the claimant must specifically plead and prove a hostile assertion of ownership, disclaiming the original title from a particular date, which was not accomplished her....
The judgment emphasizes the legal principles of adverse possession, including the requirements of open, clear, continuous, and hostile possession, burden of proof, and the need for a substantial ques....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that convincing evidence is required to establish settled possession through adverse possession, and mere inferential circumstances are not suffici....
Continuous possession must be proven to obtain an injunction; mere revenue entries are not conclusive if rebutted by evidence.
Claim of adverse possession requires open, continuous possession with knowledge to the rightful owner. Plaintiffs failed to provide sufficient evidence, resulting in dismissal.
The burden of proof is on the plaintiff in a suit for declaration and possession. Timely action is required in seeking mandatory injunction. Failure to establish title and adverse possession by the d....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
