Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
SANDEEP V.MARNE
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Shirdi Industries Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the parties and matter of arbitration. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details on claims awarded by the arbitral tribunal. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. petitioner's contention against the award. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 4. respondent's defense against the petition. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. expert appointment and relevance in arbitration. (Para 16 , 18) |
| 6. arbitral tribunal's rationale for awarding claims. (Para 24 , 25) |
| 7. legal principles governing arbitration claims. (Para 26 , 29) |
| 8. court's endorsement of tribunal's findings. (Para 30 , 32) |
JUDGMENT :
SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
1. Petitioner-Insurance Company has filed the present Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Arbitration Act) challenging unanimous Award of the Three-Member Arbitral Tribunal dated 20 September 2022. By the impugned Award, the Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs.30,99,555/- in favour of the Respondent alongwith interest @ 12.5% p.a. from 16 August 2016 till realisation. The Arbitral Tribunal has also awarded costs of Rs.29,44,021/- to the Respondent.
2. Petitioner is a nationalised general insurance company. The Respondent is an incorporated entity engaged in manufacturing of various types of wood
The tribunal can appoint an expert to aid its understanding, and an insurer is not bound by the surveyor's report if it relies on valid grounds to depart from it.
Point of law: Court is unable to accept that the impugned award suffers from any patent illegality that strikes at the root of the said matter. It is also not contrary to the fundamental policy of In....
Consent obtained under economic duress can invalidate contractual agreements in arbitration; courts respect arbitral awards barring serious legal flaws.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the deference to the learned Arbitrator's decisions based on a reasonable interpretation of facts and materials on record, as well as the entitleme....
The court annulled the arbitral award for misinterpretation of insurance policy terms, improper calculation of depreciation, and lack of independent reasoning in affirming mixed assessments for claim....
Insurance companies cannot avoid liability by citing external compensations, and second surveyors must be appointed with regulatory oversight.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
