SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Bom) 1446

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, CJ, GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.
Rajaram Bhagwan Jha – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra – Respondent
Criminal Writ Petition No. 6148 of 2025
Decided On : 09-12-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Rajeev R. Chaudhary
For the Respondents: M.M. Deshmukh, K.V. Saste, Bakul Bhosale

Court can quash criminal proceedings to prevent abuse of process of law when parties amicably settle disputes, ensuring justice is served.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Indian Penal Code - Sections 324, 452, 427 r/w 34 - Quashing of F.I.R. and charge sheet - Dispute between parties arose from a neighborly altercation; parties settled differences amicably and sought quashing of proceedings - Consent from the respondent recorded through an affidavit - Court emphasized power to quash proceedings to prevent abuse of process - No useful purpose in continuing prosecution. (Paras 1-5) Fact of the case: The petitioners are neighbors engaged in businesses at a commercial complex; altercation occurred on 21st July 2017 leading to the F.I.R. and ongoing charge sheet.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the disputes were resolved amicably and allowed the quashing of the F.I.R. and charge sheet.

Issues: The primary issue was whether the proceedings could be quashed given the amicable resolution of disputes.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reaffirmed that it can quash criminal proceedings to prevent abuse of law when disputes are resolved to meet the ends of justice.

Result: Criminal Writ Petition allowed.

Table of Content
1. description of the factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2)
2. settlement of disputes by the parties. (Para 3 , 4)
3. judicial authority to quash proceedings for justice. (Para 5)

JUDGMENT :

GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.

1. The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quashing by consent of F.I.R. bearing No.317/2017, registered with Samta Nagar Police Station and charge sheet bearing C.C. No.1938/PW/2019 pending in the file of the 17th Court of the JMFC at Borivali under section 324, 452, 427 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioners.

2. The petitioners and the respondent no.2 were neighbors in a commercial complex named as “V Mall” wherein both of them were conducting their respective business. On 21st July 2017, there was an altercation between the petitioners and the respondent no.2 which culminated into the present F.I.R. A chargesheet is filed in the present matter bearing CC No. 1938/PW/2019 with the 17th Court at J.M.F.C. Borivali and the same is pending before the learned Court.

3. The parties have now settled their disputes. The learned advocates submit that the dispute is of a trivial nature and over the passage of time, the relations between the petitioners and the respondent no.2 have improved and the parties have decided to put a quietus to the said issue.

4. Mr. Bhosale, the learned counsel for the respondent no.2 has tendered an affidavit dated 8th December 2025 across the bar which records that the respondent no.2 had settled the differences with the petitioners and has no objection to the quashing of the said FIR and proceedings arising therefrom. The affidavit is taken on record and attached at the appropriate place. The parties are present in the Court and are identified by their respective advocates. The parties have also affixed their signatures and recorded their appearance in their own handwriting on a blank sheet of paper. The appearance of the parties and copies of their Aadhaar Cards are taken on record.

5. As held by the Supreme Court in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab, (2012) 10 SCC 303, the Court is empowered to quash the criminal proceedings to prevent the abuse of process of law and meet the ends of justice. As the disputes are amicably resolved, we are of the view that no fruitful purpose would be served by continuing the prosecution against the petitioners. Accordingly, the present Criminal Writ Petition No. 6148 of 2025 is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) which reads as under:-

“a) That the Hon’ble Court may be pleased to quash and set aside the F.I.R. bearing No.317/2017, registered with Samta Nagar Police Station, and charge sheet bearing C.C. No.1938/PW/2019 pending in the file of the 17th Court of the JMFC at Borivali under section 324, 452, 427 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioners.”

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top