IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, CJ, GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.
Rajaram Bhagwan Jha – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra – Respondent
Criminal Writ Petition No. 6148 of 2025
Decided On : 09-12-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. description of the factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. settlement of disputes by the parties. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. judicial authority to quash proceedings for justice. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT :
GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.
1. The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quashing by consent of F.I.R. bearing No.317/2017, registered with Samta Nagar Police Station and charge sheet bearing C.C. No.1938/PW/2019 pending in the file of the 17th Court of the JMFC at Borivali under section 324, 452, 427 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioners.
2. The petitioners and the respondent no.2 were neighbors in a commercial complex named as “V Mall” wherein both of them were conducting their respective business. On 21st July 2017, there was an altercation between the petitioners and the respondent no.2 which culminated into the present F.I.R. A chargesheet is filed in the present matter bearing CC No. 1938/PW/2019 with the 17th Court at J.M.F.C. Borivali and the same is pending before the learned Court.
3. The parties have now settled their disputes. The learned advocates submit that the dispute is of a trivial nature and over the passage of time, the relations between the petitioners and the respondent no.2 have improved and the parties have decided to put a quietus to the said issue.
4. Mr. Bhosale, the learned counsel for the respondent no.2 has tendered an affidavit dated 8th December 2025 across the bar which records that the respondent no.2 had settled the differences with the petitioners and has no objection to the quashing of the said FIR and proceedings arising therefrom. The affidavit is taken on record and attached at the appropriate place. The parties are present in the Court and are identified by their respective advocates. The parties have also affixed their signatures and recorded their appearance in their own handwriting on a blank sheet of paper. The appearance of the parties and copies of their Aadhaar Cards are taken on record.
5. As held by the Supreme Court in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab, (2012) 10 SCC 303, the Court is empowered to quash the criminal proceedings to prevent the abuse of process of law and meet the ends of justice. As the disputes are amicably resolved, we are of the view that no fruitful purpose would be served by continuing the prosecution against the petitioners. Accordingly, the present Criminal Writ Petition No. 6148 of 2025 is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) which reads as under:-
“a) That the Hon’ble Court may be pleased to quash and set aside the F.I.R. bearing No.317/2017, registered with Samta Nagar Police Station, and charge sheet bearing C.C. No.1938/PW/2019 pending in the file of the 17th Court of the JMFC at Borivali under section 324, 452, 427 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioners.”
Court can quash criminal proceedings to prevent abuse of process of law when parties amicably settle disputes, ensuring justice is served.
Court has inherent powers to quash FIRs arising from settled disputes in sexual offence cases, despite general discouragement against such actions.
The court can quash an FIR when the complainant withdraws support due to resolution of misunderstandings, as a measure to prevent abuse of legal processes.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.