Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
SANDEEP V. MARNE
Dhananjay Shivram Mapare – Appellant
Versus
Vilas Eknath Kapre – Respondent
SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
1) Revisionary jurisdiction of this Court is invoked for setting up a challenge to the order dated 22 December 2017 passed by the Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Daund, rejecting the application preferred by the Applicants/Defendants seeking rejection of Plaint under the provisions of Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (the Code).
2) There is a chequered history of litigation between the parties. The great-grandmother of Applicant Nos.1 and 2 initiated the litigation by filing Special Civil Suit No.76 of 1996 for partition and separate possession against Respondent No.1 and his wife. Said Suit was dismissed on 30 October 1999. The Plaintiffs in that Suit filed First Appeal No.192 of 2001 before this Court. By Judgment and Order dated 3 February 2011, the First Appeal was allowed and the Suit was remanded for fresh decision. Respondent No.1 and his wife sought review of order dated 3 February 2011 and their Review Petition came to be dismissed. After remand, the Suit was renumbered as RCS No. 65 of 2012. In that Suit, the Trial Court passed a preliminary decree for partition fixing the shares between the parties. Aggrieved by the p
A civil suit must disclose a valid cause of action; submission of frivolous claims to prolong litigation is impermissible and warrants rejection at the outset.
The court held that a plaint can only be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 if it does not disclose a cause of action, and the issue of limitation is a mixed question of law and fact.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for a meaningful reading of the plaint, scrutiny of the cause of action, and prevention of illusory causes of action to avoid circumventin....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that re-litigating issues already decided in previous suits and filing a suit as a tool of re-litigation constitutes an abuse of process of law.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of considering documents filed along with the plaint for deciding the application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. The judgment emphasized....
The right to seek partition is a recurring cause of action, and a fresh suit is not barred by the dismissal of a previous suit for non-prosecution under CPC.
A suit cannot be dismissed at an early stage under Order 7 Rule 11 based solely on time limitation when material factual disputes exist.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
