SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Mad) 2468

V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
B. Rajamani – Appellant
Versus
N. Gunasekaran – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioners:Kandhan Duraisamy, Advocate. For the Respondents:S. Venkatesh, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the Fair and Final Orders dated 24.10.2016 made in I.A.No.507 of 2016 in O.S.No.550 of 2016 on the file of the Second Additional Subordinate Court, Coimbatore and pray to set-aside the same.)

1.This case has a checkered history. The Revision before me arises against an order passed by the Learned IInd Additional Subordinate Judge Coimbatore in I.A.No.507 of 2016 in O.S.No.550 of 2016 dated 24.10.2016. The said application was filed under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. It was dismissed, hence, the revision.

Facts Leading To The Case

2. There was a gentleman by the name of Nanjappa Konar. He got the suit schedule mentioned property by way of a registered partition deed in document No.2129 of 1929 dated 20.06.1929. The document is registered on the file of the Joint Sub-Registrar No.II, Coimbatore. Nanjappa Konar had two wives, his first wife was called Marudhiakkal & his second wife was one Palaniammal.

3. Nanjappa Konar sold the property to his first wife Marudhiakkal by way of a registered sale deed in document No.1053 of 1936 dated 25.05.1936. The document is re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top