Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
R.I. CHAGLA
Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
SRC Company Infra Private Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of claims and background of arbitration. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments related to liability for royalty payments. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. discussion on ignorance of law and contractual obligations. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. validity of tender committee meetings and internal communications. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 5. court's view on arbitrators' interpretation of contract. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 6. validity of internal notes in contract interpretation. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48) |
| 7. conclusions on the admissibility and impact of internal documents. (Para 49 , 50 , 51) |
| 8. final judgment based on contractual obligations and arbitration findings. (Para 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67) |
| 9. orders concluding the case and remedies. (Para 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72) |
JUDGMENT :
R.I. Chagla, J.
1. By the Commercial Arbitration Petition No. 646 of 2021, the Petitioner- Respondent in the arbitral proceedings has impugned the majority Award dated 22nd May 2020 (“the said Award”) under Section 34 of the Arbitration
The court held that the Arbitral Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction by interpreting the contract against its clear terms, which specified the responsibility for royalty charges lay with the Responden....
Arbitration - If the Arbitrator so appointed resigns his appointment or vacates his office or is unable or unwilling to act due to any reason whatsoever, the authority appointing him may appoint a ne....
The court affirmed the limited scope of review under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, emphasizing respect for arbitral awards unless stark violations of public policy or procedural....
The court affirmed that judicial review of arbitration awards is limited, allowing intervention only for evident legal errors, not for reevaluation of evidence or correctness.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
