Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
JASMEET SINGH
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Rama Constructions Company – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dispute over completion date and payment. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. challenge to arbitral award and its findings. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 3. petitioner's alleged grounds for award challenge. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. jurisdictional exceeding and contractual interpretation. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. claims and their validity regarding payment. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 6. issues regarding additional payments and bonuses. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 7. respondent's maintainability arguments and supporting evidence. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 8. court’s role and standards for arbitration awards. (Para 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 9. minimal judicial intervention principles outlined. (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45) |
| 10. detailed review and reasons of the arbitrator's decisions. (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55) |
| 11. further discussion on claims and award validity. (Para 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62) |
| 12. realities concerning withheld amounts addressed. (Para 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68) |
| 13. assessment of penalties and their legitimacy. (Para 69 , 70 , 71 , 72) |
| 14. discussion on completion dates and watch and ward arguments. (Para 73 , 74 |
The court affirmed the limited scope of review under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, emphasizing respect for arbitral awards unless stark violations of public policy or procedural....
The court upheld the Arbitrator's findings that the rescission of the contract was unjust and delays were primarily attributable to the petitioner, affirming the award under Section 34 of the Arbitra....
The court emphasized the requirement for the arbitrator to assign reasons in support of the award and the limited scope of interference by the court in arbitration awards.
The court confirmed the validity of the Arbitrator's findings regarding excess work claims and the correct application of interest, highlighting that overlapping interest claims were erroneous.
Judicial review of arbitral awards is limited; courts should not interfere unless there is clear evidence of perversity or violation of public policy.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the correct interpretation and application of contractual provisions in arbitration disputes.
The court affirmed that arbitral awards challenging under Sections 34 and 37 are limited in scope, requiring clear evidence of illegality or perversion; otherwise, the Arbitrator's decision stands.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
