Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
SANDEEP V.MARNE
SSD Escatics Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Goregaon Pearl Cooperative Housing Society Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of da breaches and termination (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. petitioner challenges award perversity and benefit restoration (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. respondent defends termination and no-compensation clauses (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 4. court outlines da clauses and alleged breaches (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 5. developer's breaches validate da termination (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 6. clause 22 enforceable barring developer compensation (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58) |
| 7. s.64 restoration distinct from s.73 compensation (Para 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72) |
| 8. no contractual bar to s.64 benefit restoration (Para 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87) |
| 9. transit rent not benefit under s.64 (Para 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92) |
| 10. fsi purchase price restorable benefit under s.64 (Para 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105) |
| 11. incomplete construction costs not s.64 benefit (Para 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110) |
| 12. awar |
Upon valid termination of redevelopment agreement for developer's breaches, no-damages clause bars compensation but society must restore purchase price of utilized FSI/tit-bit land as 'benefit' under....
The court upheld the principle that undertaking given to secure performance of contractual obligations revives a terminated contract, allowing specific performance claims despite prior termination by....
In redevelopment disputes under Arbitration Act Section 9, society members' right to safe housing from dilapidated buildings prevails over developer's profit rights where developer caused 13-year del....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to grant interim measures under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, based on a strong prima facie case i....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the formal Development Agreement (DA) is an essential condition of the contract, and without it, there is no concluded contract and no enforce....
The absence of a direct contractual relationship prohibits third-party purchasers from claiming specific performance against the society post-termination of the development agreement.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
