SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Bom) 38

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.
Vidya International School through its Principal, Shubhangi Rupesh Shinde – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra – Respondent
Civil Writ Petition No. 15263 of 2025
Decided On : 12-01-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Shrinath Badade, Rayyan Shah, Vaibhav Kadam
For the Respondents: P.P. Kakade, Priyanka Chavan

The court mandated timely processing of educational grant claims, ensuring compliance with statutory obligations for reimbursement under the relevant education Act.

Headnote:(A) Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 - Writ Petition seeking release of arrears towards entitlement grants - Directions issued for scrutiny of the petitioner's case and determination of eligible reimbursement amount within specified timelines. (Paras 2-4)

(B) Educational Grants - Requirement for timely release of funds to eligible institutions under relevant educational law to ensure compliance with statutory provisions.

(C) Legal Recourse - Provision for the petitioner to challenge a denial of reimbursement through reasoned orders as per law.

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, a school, sought direction for the release of arrears under the education Act, drawing upon precedents of similar orders in earlier Writ Petitions.

Findings of Court:
The court granted the State eight weeks to scrutinize the petitioner's eligibility and ordered the release of due reimbursement within two weeks of that determination.

Issues: The primary issue addressed was the entitlement to grants under the education Act and the timeline for their release.

Ratio Decidendi: The court underscored the necessity for prompt action by the State regarding educational reimbursements and established a framework for ensuring compliance with educational statutes.

Result: Writ Petition disposed of as directed.

Table of Content
1. claim for reimbursement under education act. (Para 2)
2. directions for scrutiny and reimbursement timeline. (Para 3)
3. writ petition disposed off. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT :

RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally with the consent of the Parties.

2. The sole request made in this Writ Petition is for a direction to release the amount of arrears which the Petitioner claims towards entitlement grants under the provisions of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.

3. Our attention is invited to earlier orders passed in the Writ Petitions seeking similar relief. Thus, following the order passed in Writ Petition No. 6020 of 2024 ( Gurukul English Medium School Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ) dated 2nd May 2024, the following directions are issued :-

(i) Time of eight weeks is granted to the Respondents/State of Maharashtra to scrutinize the case of the Petitioner.

(ii) The eligibility as well as quantum of reimbursement would be determined by the concerned Respondent.

(iii) The admissible amount of reimbursement to the Petitioner be released within a period of two weeks thereafter.

(iv) If the Petitioner is not entitled for any amount of reimbursement, a reasoned order to that effect be passed, and the Petitioner would be at liberty to seek redressal of his grievance, in accordance with law.

4. This Writ Petition is disposed off in the above terms. Rule is discharged.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top