Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Manish Pitale, Manjusha Deshpande
Jagannath Pandurang Waghare – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
MANISH PITALE, J.
The appellant has challenged judgment and order dated 25.05.2017 passed by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Mangaon, District Raigad (hereinafter referred to as the Trial Court) in Special POCSO Case No.1 of 2016, whereby the appellant has been found guilty of having committed rape of his own minor daughter. He was convicted for offence under Section 376 (2)(f) and (i) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ( IPC ) and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life, which shall be imprisonment for the remainder of natural life along with fine of Rs.1,000 and in default of payment of fine, to suffer simple imprisonment for 15 days. The appellant was also convicted for offence under Section 5 (j)(ii) and (l) read with Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act) and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and to pay fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default of which to suffer simple imprisonment for 15 days. The substantive sentences of imprisonment were directed to run concurrently.
2. The prosecution case in brief is that the appellant being an agricultural labourer, was living with his wife, minor daughter and minor
In sexual offences against minors, the victim's credible testimony can suffice for conviction, especially when corroborated by medical evidence, thus establishing statutory presumption of guilt.
School records based on parental statements given primacy over ossification tests for proving minor victim's age in POCSO cases; sole credible testimony of prosecutrix sufficient for convicting fathe....
The presumption of guilt under the POCSO Act applies where conclusive DNA evidence establishes the accused's wrongdoing, despite contradictory testimonies from the victim and her mother, solidifying ....
The court affirmed that the victim's testimony, corroborated by DNA evidence, is sufficient for conviction in sexual assault cases, emphasizing the need for sensitivity in evaluating such evidence.
The prosecution must establish the identity and age of the victim beyond reasonable doubt in sexual offense cases, particularly involving minors, and the evidentiary value of DNA reports is contingen....
The court established that a minor's testimony can be sufficient for conviction in sexual assault cases, even without corroborative medical evidence, if it is credible.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on the victim's unshaken testimony, the presumption of guilt under Section 29 of the POCSO Act, and the impact of the amendment to Sec....
The court upheld the conviction based on the victim's credible testimony and medical evidence, affirming that under the POCSO Act, the burden shifts to the accused to rebut presumption of guilt.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
