SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Bom) 1889

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
M.M. NERLIKAR, J.
Ravindra Balvantrao Dhote - Appellant
Vs.
Mahadev Namdev Raut - Respondent
Criminal Application [Appa] No. 945 Of 2024 In Criminal Appeal [Stamp] No. 7002 Of 2024
Decided On : 16-12-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Ms. S.K. Phaltankar, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. S.P. Hedaoo, Advocate

Victims have the statutory right to appeal acquittals under Section 372 of the CrPC, ensuring access to justice irrespective of complainant status, broadening the definition of 'victim' to encompass loss or injury.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 372 and 378 - Appeal pertaining to acquittal by trial court - Clarification that victims can appeal under the proviso to Section 372 - The definition of ‘victim’ extends to those suffering loss due to acts for which accused charged (Paras 6.4, 6.5, 10).

(B) Rights of Victims - The right to appeal for a victim is a statutory right aligned with Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution - Section 372 provides an independent avenue for appeals by victims without needing special leave, factoring the mental, physical, or financial injury (Paras 8, 9).

(C) Applicability of Provisions - The court reiterated that Section 372 enables victims to appeal against acquittals irrespective of being a complainant or not, thus ensuring access to justice (Paras 3, 4).

Facts of the case:
The appellant challenged an acquittal ruling under IPC by invoking Section 378 of the CrPC, seeking clarity on the victim's rights to appeal against acquittal and emphasizing alignment with recent precedents by the Supreme Court.

Findings of Court:
The court acknowledged the necessity for victims to have unencumbered access to appellate rights and mandated the transfer of the appeal to a higher court for appropriate examination.

Issues: The court addressed whether a victim, in this case, had the lawful entitlement to appeal an acquittal ruling and delineated the rights subordinate to these contexts.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the statutory provisions enable a victim of a crime to maintain appeal rights independently, emphasizing their right under Section 372 regardless of their status as a complainant.

Result: Appeal transferred to the concerned District and Sessions Court for further proceedings.

Order :

M.M. NERLIKAR, J.

The principal challenge in this matter pertains to acquittal in case under the provisions of Indian Penal Code, 1860. This Application/Appeal is filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

2. Now so far as the issue in respect of preferring Appeal under Section 372 of the Code by the complainant/victim is concerned, the same was considered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of M/s. Celestium Financial .Vrs. A. Gnanasekaran Etc (2025 SCC Online SC 1320), wherein the Supreme Court has held as under:

“6.4 On a reading of the definition of ‘victim’, it is clear that the said expression is initially exhaustive and thereafter inclusive. The expression ‘victim’ means a person who has suffered any loss or injury. The loss or injury could be either physical, mental, a financial loss or injury. The expression injury could also be construed as a legal injury in a wider sense and not just a physical or a mental injury. The loss or injury must be caused by reason of an act or omission for which the accused person has been charged. Thus, it can be both by a positive act or negatively by an omission which is at the instance of the accused and for which such accused has been charged. Further, the expression ‘victim’ also includes his/her guardian or legal heir in the case of demise of the victim.

6.5 Thus, the expression ‘victim’ has been couched in a broad manner so as to include a person who has suffered any loss or injury. The expressions ‘loss’ or ‘injury’ themselves are of a very broad import which expressions also enlarge the scope of the expression ‘victim’. Further, the expression ‘victim’ includes not only the person who has suffered any loss or injury caused by reason of any act or omission for which the accused person has been charged but also includes his or her guardian or legal heir which means that the definition of victim is inclusive in nature.

6.6 Having regard to the insertion of the proviso to Section 372 of the CrPC, we find that in the case of a victim who seeks to file an appeal, he or she could proceed under the proviso to of the CrPC in the circumstances mentioned therein and need not prefer an appeal by invoking Section 378 (4) of the CrPC which is in respect of appeals to be filed by a complainant. It may be that the complainant is a victim in certain cases and therefore, the victim has the right to file an appeal under the proviso to of the CrPC and need not proceed under (4) of the CrPC. However, if the complainant is not a victim and intends to file an appeal, in such a case a complainant would have to proceed under of the CrPC which circumscribes the right to file an appeal by virtue of the conditions which are stipulated under the said Section.

7.9 In this context, we wish to state that the proviso to Section 372 does not make a distinction between an accused who is charged of an offence under the penal law or a person who is deemed to have committed an offence under Section 138 of the Act. Symmetrical to a victim of an offence, a victim of a deemed offence under Section 138 of the Act also has the right to prefer an appeal against any order passed by the court acquitting the accused or convicting for a lesser offence or imposing an inadequate compensation. When viewed from the perspective of an offence under any penal law or a deemed offence under Section 138 of the Act, the right to file an appeal is not circumscribed by any condition as such, so long as the appeal can be premised in accordance with proviso to which is the right to file an appeal by a victim, provided the circumstances which enable such a victim to file an appeal are met. The complainant under Section 138 is the victim who must also have the right to prefer an appeal under the said provision. Merely because the proceeding under Section 138 of the Act commences with the filing of a complaint under Section 200 of the CrPC by a complainant, he does not cease to be a victim inasmuch as it

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top