IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
VIBHA KANKANWADI, HITEN S.VENEGAVKAR
Padmaja D/o Sanjay Ladda – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India, through its Principal Secretary, New Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks nri quota admission. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. state's rationale for amended nri definition. (Para 5 , 6 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. court's examination of statutory scheme and definitions. (Para 7 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 20) |
| 4. no repugnancy between state and union laws. (Para 18 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. legislative policy and role of executive instructions. (Para 19 , 21 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 6. nri quota restrictions address misuse concerns. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 7. state maintains legislative competence. (Para 32 , 33) |
| 8. amended nri definition upheld. (Para 34) |
| 9. writ petition dismissed. (Para 35 , 36) |
JUDGMENT :
HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the petition is taken up for final hearing.
2. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution arises in the context of admissions to postgraduate medical courses (MD/MS) in the State of Maharashtra for the academic year 2025-2026. The petitioner has completed MBBS from MGM University, Chhatrapati Sambhaji Nagar and desires admission to postgraduate medical courses against State quota seats in Government/Corporation, State or Central Governmen
Consortium of Deemed Universities in Karnataka & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
P.A. Inamdar v. State of Maharashtra
The amended definition of 'Non-Resident Indian' under state law is constitutional, prioritizing statutory eligibility over broader interpretations and reinforcing the State's authority in regulating ....
The court ruled that admissions under the NRI quota must adhere to existing rules, and arbitrary changes post-admission are invalid.
OCI cardholders are ineligible to sponsor candidates under NRI quota if their OCI card was issued after the 2021 Government Notification restricting such sponsorship rights.
The restriction imposed by the 2016 Rules on the right guaranteed under Article 19(1)(g) is reasonable and thus saved by clause (6) of Article 19.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the transfer of NRI quota seats to the unreserved category was permissible under the relevant provisions of the Prospectus and Information Bul....
The Chandigarh Administration has the authority to impose distinct admission criteria for MBBS and BDS courses for Foreign Indian Students, justifying the exclusion of NRI wards among other provision....
Reservation of postgraduate medical seats based on domicile is constitutional, supporting local education while respecting equality principles.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.