IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MANJU RANI CHAUHAN
Arun Pratap Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J.
1. Written submissions provided by learned counsel for the parties are taken on record.
2. As a common cause of action has been agitated in all the writ petitions, the same are being decided by a common judgment.
3. A composite counter affidavit has been filed in Writ-A No. 179 of 2026, addressing legal issues rather than factual ones. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not propose to file a rejoinder affidavit to the same, as the petitions are being decided solely on the legal issues.
4. Heard Mr. Ashok Khare, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Siddharth Khare, Mr. Mohd. Yaseen and Mr. Navin Kumar Sharma, Mr. Nipun Singh, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Shashank Shekhar Mishra, Mr. Tarun Agrawal, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Prashant Mishra, learned counsels for the petitioners in the present case as well as connected petitions, Mr. Abhishek Srivastava, learned Chief Standing Counsel-VII assisted by Mr. Rishi Kumar, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel, Mr. Shailendra Singh, learned Standing Counsel, Mr. R. P. Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Mr. Ashish Kumar Nagvanshi, learned counsel for the re


Sri Pubi Lombi vs. The State of Arunachal Pradesh and Others
State of U.P. and others vs. Gobardhan Lal
Somesh Tiwari v. Union of India
State of U.P. v. Gobardhan Lal
E.P. Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu
Federation of Railway Officers Association and Others vs. Union of India
State of Punjab and Others vs. Ram Lubhaya Bagga and Others
Union of India and others vs. S.L. Abbas
Balco Employees' Union (Regd.) vs. Union of India and Others
State of U.P. and another vs. Johri Mal
Census Commissioner and others vs. R. Krishnamurthy
The court upheld the Government Order on teacher redeployment under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, prioritizing statutory compliance and educational needs over indi....
The court ruled that the 'last in first out' principle for teacher transfers is arbitrary and violates statutory provisions, emphasizing that executive orders must align with established laws.
The G.R. on teacher transfers aligns with the RTE Act by maintaining Pupil-Teacher ratios and does not violate statutory rights of teachers.
Transfer policy guidelines do not confer legally enforceable rights unless there is a violation of statutory rules or mala fide.
Transfer orders must comply with statutory guidelines; violations invalidate them, emphasizing the importance of legal procedures in administrative actions.
The classification of government and non-government employees regarding transfer policies is valid, and the court cannot interfere in executive decisions unless statutory violations occur.
Transfer orders affecting educators mid-academic year violate principles of good governance and arbitrariness, warranting judicial intervention.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.