OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
Puja Kumari Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. Thru. Prin. Secy Deptt. Basic Education, U. P. Lucknow – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
| Table of Contents | |
| A. | Prelude |
| B. | Prevailing Rules and Policy |
| C. | Factual Matrix |
| D. | Contention of the parties |
| E. | Discussion & finding |
| F. | Conclusion |
1. Heard Shri Sharad Pathak, learned Counsel for the petitioner in leading petition, Shri Asit Chaturvedi, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Ashwini Kumar, Shri Vivek Mishra, Shri Shrikant Mishra, Shri Vijay Dixit along with Shri Devam Shukla, Shri Ravi Shanker Tewari, Shri Prashant Kumar Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioners in connected writ petitions, Shri Ran Vijay Singh, learned Counsel representing the Board, Ms. Deepshikha, learned Chief Standing Counsel assisted by Shri D.P. Mishra, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
A. Prelude
2. The common facts of these bunch of writ petitions lie in a narrow compass. The petitioners apparently claim to have been selected and posted as Assistant Teacher in Junior Basic Schools in various districts of the State of Uttar Pradesh as per the selection process prescribed under the U.P Basic Educ
A.K. Bindal v Union of India: (2003) 5 SCC 163
Bank of India Vs Jagjit Singh Mehta
Officers & Supervisors of I.D.P.L. v Chairman & M.D. I.D.P.L.
Pyare Lal Sharma V/s Managing Director (1989) 3 SCC 448
Rajendra Singh v. State of U.P.
Roshan Lal Tandon v Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.