SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Bom) 2682

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
A.S.OKA, MRIDULA BHATKAR
Reliance Industries Ltd. Raigad – Appellant
Versus
S.D. Rane – Respondent


JUDGMENT
MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.

This Letters Patent Appeal is directed against the order dated 23rd March, 2007 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 8129 of 2006.

2. The respondent was an employee in the appellant-company. He was charged for misconduct due to absentism of 188 days without leave and good reason and was terminated on 3rd March, 1998. The respondent challenged the termination on the ground of illegality, adopting unfair labour practices under section 28(1) of Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 (for short MRTU & PULP Act). In the complaint, he challenged the fairness of the inquiry and the findings of the enquiry held against him. The Labour Court declared the enquiry as unfair, perverse and not in accordance with the principles of natural justice and directed the appellant-company to prove the misconduct before the Court by leading evidence and to substantiate the punishment of termination. The said order was confirmed by the Industrial Court in the Revision application filed by the appellant-company. The appellant challenged the order of the Industrial Court by way of writ petition and the learned



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top